Hypocrite? Did you use the wrong term?
Hey, I have a question.... Indulge me......What part of your phone is touched the most? Pick up your phone and hold it...... It seems to me that your finger that taps the screen is not in constant contact, unlike the other had that actually HOLDS THE PHONE.
Maybe you are magic, and your phone floats in front of you, I don't know. I have seen a lot of cool stuff in my life, but one finger tip pressing the screen doesn't touch more than the constant and continuous contact required to hold the device in the first place.
In my case, my left hand will old the phone to my ear, or it rests in my palm to type, my fingers wrap around the sides.
When I am gaming, I hold it in landscape and press with my thumbs.
No matter what, the screen is not touched continually. I don't know how, or why your screen is touched more than the back, or sides, but I would love to see this floating phone! Can you post a video? I would pay to see it.
So, let's close this opinion vs fact that you confused....
It's fact that more surface area to hold a device makes the device easier than less surface area.
It's opinion that smaller bezels look better.
It's fact that bezel size has zero impact on the function of a screen. It is a fact that smaller side bezels as well as smaller top bezels give you less surface area to touch to avoid touching the screen.
It is a fact that glass backs on phones break with less effort than the plastic and metal ones (since you brought up what you think the direction of phones is heading).
Are we clear now? Please, one last thing..... hyopcrite?? LOL!!! What are you even talking about?
A few points in reply to a post that (unsurprisingly, but I’m disappointed nonetheless) didn’t take my advice on how to form an argument properly without making the author appear to be an unreasonable clown:
1. I stand by my comments. I didn’t say that glass backed phones are harder to break than plastic, I said that it is a requirement for wireless charging that many consumers find useful, and advised you to use a case if you wanted extra protection. No issue here.
2. It is your (and others’) opinion that having less bezel makes the phone harder to hold. It is also my (and others’) opinion that an all-screen phone like the S10e or one with slim bezels like the S9 is pretty easy to hold and use. We both disagree with each other. But at the end of the day, IT’S OPINION.
3. To counter your point, if you want thick bezels both on the top and the side because you are unable to hold a phone with slim or no bezels, the screen will be smaller than on a phone with the same dimensions. So a phone with thick bezels with (for example) a 6.2. inch screen will be way bigger than an all screen phone or one with slim bezels to the point where it is near unusable.
Try using and holding an iPhone 8 Plus against a Google Pixel 3. The former has thick bezels and the latter thin...the screen size is the same. Then tell me which is easier to hold and use, especially with one hand.
4. The logic behind all screen/slim bezel phones is the same as the one with 16:9 vs 18:9 aspect ratios. Whether you like it or not in the current market all screen/slim bezel phones sell well...ones with thick bezels don’t. If an all-screen/slim bezel design wouldn’t be popular or practical phones like the S8 or iPhone XR wouldn’t have sold well...but they DID and people loved them.
5. I may disagree with you but I’m pretty sure you can read (please correct me if I am wrong, I’ll edit this section accordingly). I said “the part of the phone you use and touch the most to actually do something” is the screen. Note the bold part of my sentence. Touching the non-screen area of the phone hardly does anything (except buttons). The screen is used to perform 99% of actions.
Reading it slowly and out loud might help you understand it better. If that doesn’t work try repeating the sentence several times at a slower pace....that’s it....you’re doing well, nearly there....understand the sentence now?
6. I called you (to be more specific I should have called your posts) hypocritical because you called my opinion false and say that I claimed it was fact (which is false). Ok. But then you claim to know what others were thinking 2 years ago. And to top it all off you go and label your opinion (which I entirely respect but they are not facts ) as fact. Hypocritical indeed.
I’ll leave it to the others on this thread to decide who’s being unreasonable. I’m trying very hard not to directly insult anybody...@mods if I’m breaking any rules pls tell me and I’ll edit my post accordingly.