SteelGator
Well-known member
The sun it literally pointing in the lens. The exposure difference between the foreground and *the SUN* is absolutely enormous, probably in the neighborhood of 20EV. There is no way HDR+ can deal with that. It did a pretty amazing job actually - that shot with any normal camera would probably be unusable.
I get that not everyone is experienced with photography, but while what this camera does is absolutely amazing, it can only defy physics so much even with the clever software.
This^^^
The intent of the post was to show that I could still shoot straight into the sun w/o the flare with a little reframing. What the camera did in that shot is amazing. I have taken similar shots with a DSLR and it would have taken at least 3 bracketed shots to get near that result. Ever tried to shoot bracketed shot handheld? Not fun, though possible with that much light. Of course then I have to go and combine the images to get HDR in post, which is not worth it for a 'snap shot' like this.
Interestingly, in cases like this, the phone shot is better than a shot I would have taken with a DSLR because I am not interested in doing post processing.
Finally, as I mentioned in the original post, if I would have had more time, I would have played with the exposure a little more, and brought more balance to the sky. I metered on the darkest spot on the photo -- the trees in the background. I was interested to see what type of detail I could pull out back there. Between the 2 shots, you can see the range that would be achievable.