Ok. Thank you very much for all the helpand sorry about your secret >.<
You people keep posting your silly little Quadrant scores with ROMs that use the stagefright hack, which on this device pretty much DOUBLES your score. I went from a 500 average stock rom to 1000 average stock rom by simply enabling that.
The Stagefright hack tricks Quadrant into thinking that you completed this one CPU test in 0 seconds because it skips it, so therefore your scores go up! Show us a Quadrant without stagefright hack on for it to be considered even close to 'accurate'![]()
Okay, we'll go with realistic & accurate this time, 748mhz, which pretty much everybody can hit, stagefright off, /data on sdcard, ubuntdroid on optimus t:
Can we just exclude the bogus stagefright results? The only reason it passes so high is because Quadrant uses a timer to see how fast the encoding and decoding takes.
However, the encoding step is FAILING with stagefright enabled, implying a false "zomg you encoded that in half a second!" benchmark. Consequently, the decoding fails just as fast since it has nothing to decode (since encoding failed).
Notice how it's not that high in CM7? CM7 is forced stagefright, but the encoder is working.
Froyo Stagefright benchmarks are fake.
Class 10? Hmm.. This may be accurate. The cpu section seems valid, despite scaled wrong in Quadrant. The I/O looks nice, and the internal nand is slow as crap so this is very possible.
Okay, we'll go with realistic & accurate this time, 748mhz, which pretty much everybody can hit, stagefright off, /data on sdcard, ubuntdroid on optimus t:
![]()
You used the samsung galaxy dirty i/o (aka galaxy lag fix) which inflates your I/O causing for a higher, inaccurate quadrant score. Also, it was this same hack, which they did on the internal drive, which caused hardware to start failing. [Reference] The life of your SD card my vary doing this.