Post Pictures Taken With the Bionic Camera

5sVN6.jpg


ueoTA.jpg




Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
 
My baby finally gets some love after being exposed to 3 megapixels for too long. took it with a sandwich and a drink in my hands while walking out of work, so it's not the highest quality shot or anything but shrug.


edit:
added a pic of my other baby eating her foot.. and I threw in a macro shot just seeing how it looks
 
Last edited:
Wow, looking at the pictures in this post, Motorola camera is not good at all. Bad picture quality. :eek:
 
Not too bad of picture quality. My Incredible and Droid Charge had much better picture quality. Still really like the phone regardless.:cool:
 
Not too bad of picture quality. My Incredible and Droid Charge had much better picture quality. Still really like the phone regardless.:cool:

Ummm is that some really messed up speakers...or like the cylinders on an engine? I can't really tell but those things are huge.
 
This photo was taken this evening on my Bionic using "HDR Camera+" from the app store, which is a fabulous app!

attachment.php
 
Took both my Bionic and my Canon Rebel out today and I thought people might like to see some more images. These are the sorts of things I might take out and about and I think the Bionic's camera really held its own. These are unretouched and taken either with the landscape or scene settings or macro settings.

Here is a Bionic macro shot of a hibiscus:
Bionic Macro | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

and the Canon rendering of the same flower using the standard lens with the macro setting.
Hibiscus-macro canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

If you click through to the pics and look at the full size image- the Bionic really does rival the canon in terms of detail, though the Bionic coloring is cooler in color; the Canon is more accurate here.

Here is a set of concrete stairs at the Park I was at. First the Bionic:
Red rails | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
and the Canon:
Red lined stairs-canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

The Canon's colors are more accurate but I actually prefer the Bionic Image which was taken on auto.

By the way I have complained myself about the auto focus and wondered how well it would handle moving subjects like Kids. This is my son who was competing in a foot race. He was not going to hold still for a slow autofocus!
He's off! Bionic | Flickr - Photo Sharing!:D

Finally, my last shots. A couple of low hanging Osage oranges:
First the Bionic:
Osage Orange-Bionic | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
And then the Canon-standard lens on macro setting:
Osage -Canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

If you click through to the full sized versions of these in my Flickr stream you'll see that the Bionic in good light can rival my DSLR in capturing detail. I don't know that this is the best phone camera out there in terms of image quality, and it really can't replace a good modern point and shoot, but I am more than pleased with the camera's performance outdoors. :):):)

Oh I did play with the Panorama feature-the result is interesting but the images are not full sized. So not a feature that is quite ready for prime time- but it is slick the way it works.
 
At the golf course today with HDR Camera+

attachment.php


Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Took both my Bionic and my Canon Rebel out today and I thought people might like to see some more images. These are the sorts of things I might take out and about and I think the Bionic's camera really held its own. These are unretouched and taken either with the landscape or scene settings or macro settings.

Here is a Bionic macro shot of a hibiscus:
Bionic Macro | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

and the Canon rendering of the same flower using the standard lens with the macro setting.
Hibiscus-macro canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

If you click through to the pics and look at the full size image- the Bionic really does rival the canon in terms of detail, though the Bionic coloring is cooler in color; the Canon is more accurate here.

Here is a set of concrete stairs at the Park I was at. First the Bionic:
Red rails | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
and the Canon:
Red lined stairs-canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

The Canon's colors are more accurate but I actually prefer the Bionic Image which was taken on auto.

By the way I have complained myself about the auto focus and wondered how well it would handle moving subjects like Kids. This is my son who was competing in a foot race. He was not going to hold still for a slow autofocus!
He's off! Bionic | Flickr - Photo Sharing!:D

Finally, my last shots. A couple of low hanging Osage oranges:
First the Bionic:
Osage Orange-Bionic | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
And then the Canon-standard lens on macro setting:
Osage -Canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

If you click through to the full sized versions of these in my Flickr stream you'll see that the Bionic in good light can rival my DSLR in capturing detail. I don't know that this is the best phone camera out there in terms of image quality, and it really can't replace a good modern point and shoot, but I am more than pleased with the camera's performance outdoors. :):):)

Oh I did play with the Panorama feature-the result is interesting but the images are not full sized. So not a feature that is quite ready for prime time- but it is slick the way it works.

How's the image reproduction of this camera vs. The thunderbolts camera?

Sent from my Thunderbolt using tapatalk
 
Burned out school bus captured as we drove by Rt 422 in Pa; nice to have a good camera on you when you see something interesting :-)

14650d1315784664-post-pictures-taken-bionic-camera-uploadfromtaptalk1315784675698.jpg


Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: jroc
Took both my Bionic and my Canon Rebel out today and I thought people might like to see some more images. These are the sorts of things I might take out and about and I think the Bionic's camera really held its own. These are unretouched and taken either with the landscape or scene settings or macro settings.

Here is a Bionic macro shot of a hibiscus:
Bionic Macro | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

and the Canon rendering of the same flower using the standard lens with the macro setting.
Hibiscus-macro canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

If you click through to the pics and look at the full size image- the Bionic really does rival the canon in terms of detail, though the Bionic coloring is cooler in color; the Canon is more accurate here.

Here is a set of concrete stairs at the Park I was at. First the Bionic:
Red rails | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
and the Canon:
Red lined stairs-canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

The Canon's colors are more accurate but I actually prefer the Bionic Image which was taken on auto.

By the way I have complained myself about the auto focus and wondered how well it would handle moving subjects like Kids. This is my son who was competing in a foot race. He was not going to hold still for a slow autofocus!
He's off! Bionic | Flickr - Photo Sharing!:D

Finally, my last shots. A couple of low hanging Osage oranges:
First the Bionic:
Osage Orange-Bionic | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
And then the Canon-standard lens on macro setting:
Osage -Canon | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

If you click through to the full sized versions of these in my Flickr stream you'll see that the Bionic in good light can rival my DSLR in capturing detail. I don't know that this is the best phone camera out there in terms of image quality, and it really can't replace a good modern point and shoot, but I am more than pleased with the camera's performance outdoors. :):):)

Oh I did play with the Panorama feature-the result is interesting but the images are not full sized. So not a feature that is quite ready for prime time- but it is slick the way it works.

Whoever sees this post and still think the camera is "horrible' "horrific" "SUCKS!!!" or whatever descriptive term thats used for it....I dont know what else to say except everybody's entitled to their opinion...
 

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
956,646
Messages
6,969,307
Members
3,163,594
Latest member
sumank89