It depends on the roaming agreements. Assuming that they are in place then you would get service at no extra charge.So say i am in a location with no service would i be able to get service from another provider for free? For example when i go to the mountains Verizon gets service from a local provider.
Posted via the Android Central App
Yeah its unfortunate. But when companies can charge as much as they want to allow T-Mobilr to have customers roam on their networks its expensive. Wouldn't you charge a lot if you were the company that T-Mobile wanted to roam on?TMO's roaming allowance is a joke. 5MB to 200MB. Ironic too, considering they need higher limits the most.
Yeah its unfortunate. But when companies can charge as much as they want to allow T-Mobilr to have customers roam on their networks its expensive. Wouldn't you charge a lot if you were the company that T-Mobile wanted to roam on?
TMO's roaming allowance is a joke. 5MB to 200MB. Ironic too, considering they need higher limits the most.
TMO does have a solution in some places: build out its own network, for the spectrum they own but haven't deployed (I'm talking AWS/PCS, not 700a.) But when they choose to not do that, even their legitimate complaints seem a bit like them wanting to have their cake and eat it too.
T-Mobile is so good where I live and play that I don't even turn on the roaming option on my service.
Then again that is true about AT&T, Verizon and Sprint that all have holes in their coverage. You would need to get a satellite phone if you expect to have coverage every. Also, in some high traffic areas even the over priced services like AT&T and Verizon have congestion and poor signals but they just don't care about fixing their services either with that logic....
Yes. Everyone has coverage holes, but who's likely to have more of them: AT&T, Verizon, or TMO? And especially compared with Verizon, it's not even close.
That's a great chart...except att has never used cdma....it was TDMI then they went to gsm
Posted via the Android Central App