kevinpleasants
Well-known member
- Dec 18, 2010
- 707
- 116
- 43
Samsung statement about Replacement Note 7
Samsung Statement on Replacement Note7 Devices - Samsung Newsroom
Samsung Statement on Replacement Note7 Devices - Samsung Newsroom
Basically doesn't say anything other than they're investigating. They are waiting until they have factual evidence before making any hardcore decisions
Probably way better for you than having a Note7 blow up in your eyes during a VR pr0n session...
I'm just saying it overall does not add up, but any merit to that does not matter. The device not on though makes no apparent sense. Unless he turned it off and it stayed on due to an immediate chemical short.
No, he turned it off to get ready for takeoff.I believe I read that he turned the phone off because it had started to get hot... Which, if true, means it most likely was already in the process of failing... At which point turning it off wouldn't help much.
Yep that's what it says.Basically doesn't say anything other than they're investigating. They are waiting until they have factual evidence before making any hardcore decisions
The only place in Asia that recalled devices was South Korea, so this would not be a case of a deemed "safe" device. China stated unhappiness to Samsung about no recall effort there.
I haven't read all 26 pages of comments. But in the ones I've seen there's been nothing directly suggesting that the first incident of a replacement phone catching fire - on a plane, a worst-case scenario of the type Samsung's competitors/detractors would stand to benefit by most - seems to be a bit too convenient to be automatically presumed to be a naturally-occurring, random event. Especially before the device and the circumstances of the incident have been thoroughly investigated by Samsung/CPSC. Did I miss something? Either way, the damage to Samsung and the Note 7 is probably already undo-ably done.
That says nothing.
All Samsung needs to know is the carrier and the phone number of the customer, to discern whether the phone was a replacement or not. The customer says it was. Why would she lie?
Samsung already knows the answer. That they are still holding back is disconcerting. I'm taking a flight this afternoon.
It says they are working to determine the CAUSE, not if it was a replacement.That says nothing.
All Samsung needs to know is the carrier and the phone number of the customer, to discern whether the phone was a replacement or not. The customer says it was. Why would she lie?
Samsung already knows the answer. That they are still holding back is disconcerting. I'm taking a flight this afternoon.