Nice phone but did you see the LTE download speed he gets.
LOL... yeah, he was shocked for sure. Overall it sounded like a good first take. Next week can't come sooner.Nice phone but did you see the LTE download speed he gets.
I might push an old woman down a flight of stairs for that speed. Just joking.
That's weird. The PCMag review cut the phone up regarding call quality and network speed. They're saying it's missing some of the latest LTE features and they only averaged download speeds of 10Mbps vs. 21Mbps for the LG G6. I don't quite get how it can be missing only certain LTE stuff as I understood all that to be baked into the SD835?Nice phone but did you see the LTE download speed he gets.
I might push an old woman down a flight of stairs for that speed. Just joking.
My 4-year-old BlackBerry Q10 gets over 40 Mbps over LTE. It's the network, not the phone. Call quality can also be the network, tower distance, congestion, weather, and many other factors. The PH-1 has literally every LTE/CDMA band used in the US, plus NFC and BT5. WiFi Calling is baked into Android. So, PCMag claiming it's missing features means they're uninformed, doing something incorrect, or both. Probably both. Call quality might be something but it's too soon to say if it's an issue or PCMag is doing something wrong (or even biased because it's not their favorite brand).That's weird. The PCMag review cut the phone up regarding call quality and network speed. They're saying it's missing some of the latest LTE features and they only averaged download speeds of 10Mbps vs. 21Mbps for the LG G6. I don't quite get how it can be missing only certain LTE stuff as I understood all that to be baked into the SD835?
Over 7 hours SOT and a full day of use easily.
Yeah, but Dave Lee says average to slightly below average and that makes way more sense.