I could state that, IMO, acceleration due to gravity on Earth is 5 m/s^2, but that wouldn't change anything about gravity itself.
Nobody noticed this? Maybe it is habit because of my past interest and studies in aerospace but it is 9.81 m/s2.
Exactly but they are still innovative things. I was just trying to give definition to something they would understand in order to give perspective. :thumbup:
Sent from my Nexus 4
So who has innovated more in that time period? Innovated, not threw features against the wall and see if they stick.
Wait... why are you counting 64-bit and such as innovation because Android phones don't have it, but you dismiss a 100-feature list of things iPhones don't have? Doesn't seem fair to me.
So you'd say Samsung is also doing something right?
Technology the 64 bit processor isn't new, but is new to mobile.
The idea of using a 64 bit chip itself isn't innovated at all, because it has been used in other systems years ago like the one I like to point out the most.
The N64 was a 64 bit system.
Here is the innovation in the 5s.
M7 processor to calculate motion.
Not the fact that they used a 64 bit processor but how in their design they were able improve speed dramatically of processing dramatically without having to push the cpu ghz. The last 2 chips they haven't followed ARM at certain points at all.
Their 64bit chip is beating up Baytrail and that is a very bad sign.
The design of the touchid in its high ppi scanning is innovative, but the idea of a fingerprint scanner itself is not.
Except none of these aren't earthshattering and in the end it is still kind of boring.
Nobody is going to notice any real speed difference between the iPhone 5 and 5s except maybe in gaming.
The fingerprint system has been broken.
64bit is more of a future proof technology.
We are in an era of blah from everybody right now until the next big thing comes along.