Should I wait new Note 7 or buy galaxy S7?

[Technotr]

Hi everybody.I have made a lot of research since long time,but ı cant decide what should ı buy?
-At the end.I deciced to buy galaxy s7 but I heard a new news.Galaxy note 7 will announce august 2.According to your thinking,should ı buy wait this phone or buy galaxy s7.Between the these phone,are there a lot of important difference and how much is the price of new note 7?
Especially,can you share out your knowing about new note with me.I wait your helping and hope to decide as soon as possible.

I want to thank you already now.

 

[mayconvert]

if you will use the S pen a lot, the Note is the way to go. outside the S pen. they will perform and look the same (OS wise)
I think the regular non edge S7 might be the most perfect phone ever made. not too big, not too small. Amazing phone.

 

[chanchan05]

It's not really new news. Every year a new Galaxy S will be released between March to May, and a new Note sometime between August to October.

The new Note of course will have several new features, most of which will come to the S7 if they're software features. Any informatioj currently out on the Note 7 right now is pure rumor. Nothing to say which of these are true or false.

 

[Technotr]

it's nonsense that attached to words(new news).I don't know which day to announce new note,ı think it's naturally.I want only your thinking and comments about knowing features of new note 7.İf you had your druthers wait or buy galaxy s7?

 

[Almeuit]

If you like the notes I would wait. I am interested in the next Note for sure .

 

[L0n3N1nja]

If you need a phone get an S7, don't wait, something new is always around the corner.

If you want the S Pen for notes/artwork, and don't need a new phone today, than wait.

If you just want a new phone, and don't think you will use the S Pen, than just get an S7. I wouldn't expect much of an improvement over the S7 spec wise.

After working for Verizon nearly 4 years selling phones, and owning every Note released on the network, and most galaxy S models as well, I have little reason to believe a Note 7 would be worth waiting for.

And unfortunately no one has full specs available for the Note 7 yet, so it's all speculation and rumor. Personally wouldn't wait.

Posted via the Android Central App

 

[Technotr]

Perhaps I don't need to Spen so waiting to new note 7 is not requirement,but some situtations is inwrap.Especially rumor of the 6 gb ram.I don't know that is it true or false.If it true,ı think it's the very well technology in the world of android.According to knowing you,touchwiz is not stabile on the last model,I don't know after the s5.Everybody say that you don't get into trouble about touchwiz but ı don't still rely on these saying.İt's hard to choose which should I buy.Even if ı research in the long time period,I don't decide but surely I will buy to s7 barely I research more a bit time.

 

[eve6er69]

I have found the note line to usually be 2 s-series ahead of the game. The notes seem to be more future proof. IMO.

 

[chanchan05]

I have found the note line to usually be 2 s-series ahead of the game. The notes seem to be more future proof. IMO.

Not really. I used Notes before the S7, and it's usually the Notes are in terms of specs and features just sit between the previous Galaxy S and the next one. Sometimes they just use a higher clocked version of the same CPU of the Galaxy S of that same year.

 

[eve6er69]

Not really. I used Notes before the S7, and it's usually the Notes are in terms of specs and features just sit between the previous Galaxy S and the next one. Sometimes they just use a higher clocked version of the same CPU of the Galaxy S of that same year.

From my personal experience the s4 was out when the note 3 dropped. They didn't even start putting 3gb of ram in a galaxy until the s6. That's what I'm going by. Also the note was a 32gb as the lowest model which already put it up above most galaxies for awhile also.

Just my observations from back when I owned a N3

 

[chanchan05]

From my personal experience the s4 was out when the note 3 dropped. They didn't even start putting 3gb of ram in a galaxy until the s6. That's what I'm going by. Also the note was a 32gb as the lowest model which already put it up above most galaxies for awhile also.

Just my observations from back when I owned a N3

32GB of internal memory as base has very little to do with performance. While RAM does, on an Android phone, it's not really that big of a deal other than allowing to keep more apps on suspended mode. 2GB was quite enough at the time. However when you look at the CPU, S4

 

[GMC262]

It will have a larger screen than either S7 model so if maximum screen real estate is what you seek (in the Samsung Line) the Note 7 will fill that bill. I wouldn't use the S pen much but I wouldn't mind having an S7 Edge with a 5.8 inch screen.

 

[shuura]

I'm waiting for the Note 7. The pen alone is enough. However, I do hope they include SD card support - yes I'm one of those guys! Sorry, it's a deal breaker for me, and the reason why I went from a Note 3 to a Moto X Pure.

 

[shuura]

according to GSMArena, it does/will have SD card support - Samsung Galaxy Note7 - Full phone specifications

 

[eve6er69]

32GB of internal memory as base has very little to do with performance. While RAM does, on an Android phone, it's not really that big of a deal other than allowing to keep more apps on suspended mode. 2GB was quite enough at the time. However when you look at the CPU, S4

The note3 used to run normally around 1.6gb so a few open apps and she was over 2.

 

[chanchan05]

The note3 used to run normally around 1.6gb so a few open apps and she was over 2.

Android is designed to use as much memory as possible to have apps cached to RAM for quicker access. It doesn't actually affect in app performance as opposed to opening apps faster because they were never taken out of the volatile memory. That 1.6GB used does not reflect that Android uses 1.6GB of memory. It just means that her phone has 1.6GB cached to RAM. RAM will have little impact on how smooth a game will play on the phone. It may impact how fast it loads to start, but that's about it.

 

[eve6er69]

Android is designed to use as much memory as possible to have apps cached to RAM for quicker access. It doesn't actually affect in app performance as opposed to opening apps faster because they were never taken out of the volatile memory. That 1.6GB used does not reflect that Android uses 1.6GB of memory. It just means that her phone has 1.6GB cached to RAM. RAM will have little impact on how smooth a game will play on the phone. It may impact how fast it loads to start, but that's about it.

If she has more than 5 apps in the background that she hasn't closed and it reaches around 2.45ish apps won't open. They'll force close. So yes it does effect the app performance. Especially when it won't open. Lol

 

[chanchan05]

If she has more than 5 apps in the background that she hasn't closed and it reaches around 2.45ish apps won't open. They'll force close. So yes it does effect the app performance. Especially when it won't open. Lol

You're thinking Windows. Android will suspend apps that have been left running in the background after a set amount of time. Closing apps left running in background is a core feature of Android RAM management. If an app won't close despite the system telling it to, it's an app issue not OS. And it's not exactly a performance problem.

Plus depending on the app, they rarely take up more than 50mb per app if they are running in the background. Majority of RAM use goes to cached apps.

PS: I moved from a phone with 2GB RAM (Note 2) to the S7E with 4GB RAM. With Tasker, GreenPower, Facebook, Twitter, and other automated apps running in the background. Apart from a general faster performance, no experience in having any RAM issue, with more apps opening faster because they're cached to RAM. That's practically the only performance upgrade you should see on expanding RAM: faster opening of apps. Other than that, the RAM shouldn't severely limit performance, unless youre going very low end phones.

 

[eve6er69]

You're thinking Windows. Android will suspend apps that have been left running in the background after a set amount of time.

I may not be an engineer but I'm pretty sure the note 3 runs android and not Windows.

 

[chanchan05]

I may not be an engineer but I'm pretty sure the note 3 runs android and not Windows.

That's the point. The scenario you are pertaining is how stuff runs on Windows. On Android the kind of scenario you mentioned will not happen unless it's a poorly coded app. And in that case it's not an issue with the device but the developer.