I definitely agree with this. There's a fine tuning application in the phone to make those shots look exactly as you want them to look.
I don't know why Moto seems to have trouble with the cameras in their phones. I once had the Droid Razr and Razr Maxx and the cameras were dissapointing too.
Sent from my humble S4
I think a lot of people don't realize it takes skill for good pics and they are used to being able to be mediocre and the phone take care of it for their poor skills. Phil posted a pic on his Google+ and it looked pretty darn good.
In don't really think a camera should matter in a phone at all. When it comes to the matter of purchasing one device over another, I'm going with the one that gets better reception, because without service, you basically have a mini tablet.
The camera ranks very low on my list when I am purchasing a PHONE. If you want to take professional grade photos, buy a camera instead of a phone.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Pretty amazing when you can just hone in on one insignificant word of a post rather than address the meat of it.Third party camera apps can't fix issues with the drivers or camera firmware.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Many of those (especially the first set) are excellent examples of the white balance issues I'm talking about.
Just tried it for comparisons sake. The iphone camera is still head and shoulders above the Moto X/AOSP camera combo. The difference is just too staggering and it sucks because I really liked the Moto X. Here's hoping Motorola can fix it in software by the time the wood backs are ready.
Attached is the pictures I just took. Nothing special, just firing up the camera app and taking a pic. iPhone 5 on the left, Moto X with AOSP camera on the right. the Moto X does appear to have a wider angle lens BTW.
View attachment 79173
In don't really think a camera should matter in a phone at all. When it comes to the matter of purchasing one device over another, I'm going with the one that gets better reception, because without service, you basically have a mini tablet.
The camera ranks very low on my list when I am purchasing a PHONE. If you want to take professional grade photos, buy a camera instead of a phone.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
By that logic no one would ever own a smartphone at all. If you need internet access, get a LAPTOP and not a phone. If you need GPS navigation, buy one from Garmin instead of a PHONE. Buy a calculator. Personally, I don't want to carry 12 devices around with me at all times. That's why I bought a smartphone. Yesterday we had a massive moose walk into our Cabin property. I was able to pull my S3 out and grab some great shots and video of it before it was gone. Sometimes, you need a decent camera in your phone because you will have that phone everywhere.
Just tried it for comparisons sake. The iphone camera is still head and shoulders above the Moto X/AOSP camera combo. The difference is just too staggering and it sucks because I really liked the Moto X. Here's hoping Motorola can fix it in software by the time the wood backs are ready.
Attached is the pictures I just took. Nothing special, just firing up the camera app and taking a pic. iPhone 5 on the left, Moto X with AOSP camera on the right. the Moto X does appear to have a wider angle lens BTW.
View attachment 79173
I'm not sure if you're just using the incorrect terminology, but the camera app on the X isn't AOSP. If you're in fact using the AOSP camera app then you're comparing the stock app performance on the iPhone to non-stock software on the X.
I just wanted to clarify that point in case someone else has not. If someone else has, then I apologize.![]()
Pretty amazing when you can just hone in on one insignificant word of a post rather than address the meat of it.
They're using the stock android camera.
Nexus through spacetime.