D13H4RD2L1V3
Retired Moderator
- Sep 4, 2013
- 4,407
- 0
- 0
Looks like an antenna bandWhat's up with the vertical line above the camera?
Looks like an antenna bandWhat's up with the vertical line above the camera?
Maybe you can't. I can. The display clearly lacks brightness and contrast, like previous LG devices.
That's not a first party retailer so I would say no. I think they are just guessing the price for now.
You ever keep a device for a few years as a daily driver? I haven't yetStill undecided between this and Pixel XL. Even tho the Pixel is 3450mAh, it's not removable. So in a few years if it starts acting up, I'm stuck. But with LG V20, I can just replace the battery. But hoping for no BOOTLOOP. Just confused right now still.
I'm disappointed in the screen because I know it drains the battery far worse than an LED. Especially with that always on, full ribbon strip .
Not really an inspiring design. I think the V10 looks much better. I really miss the rubberized back!!! That phone would never slip out of my hand.
You're in the vast minority.I disagree 100% with you on this. To me the quality of the display is all that matters in a display. So appropriate brightness coupled with accurate color, saturation and gray-scale representation, viewing angles, low black levels, contrast ratio are the visible things that matter in a display - and the calibration of these things is measurable and there is an objective better or worst. Do some people prefer less accurate or undersaturated or oversaturated displays? Sure. But they're preferences are in opposition to the industry standard. That doesn't mean they ought not like what they like, it just means their preferences are not in line with what is objectively better. The other giant thing about display tech that matters is power efficiency.
What you showed is irrelevant. The G5 display looks like garbage compared to the screens in that comparison and pretty much everyone would agree.Here's the thing.
You can't. There are too many other factors involved to see that in a video. You can keep repeating yourself, but the video you watched has been processed multiple times by different algorithms before getting to your eyes.
The G5 display lacked many things, but one of them was not contrast.
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160907/c33448fc0a015a94859e02a4e1250b9c.jpg
It's not irrelevant in that it completely disproves your statement about the contrast being bad.What you showed is irrelevant. The G5 display looks like garbage compared to the screens in that comparison and pretty much everyone would agree.
Lol. I crave more devices by the year but I'm pretty good at keeping my phone for 3+ years depending.You ever keep a device for a few years as a daily driver? I haven't yet. I have an addiction to moar devices.
That makes no sense. I'm standing with the industry standard. Can you explain? Do you mean average consumers with no industry knowledge? Could they be less relevant? The people who know better matter in areas of objective measurements.You're in the vast minority.
I've probably watched over 10 videos on the LG G20. Only one mentioned that the screen looked good, the Phonearena video said "this panel in particular doesn't seem to shine with any extraordinary type of glow", and the others didn't mention the main display at all, which I think they avoided talking about for a reason.I would actually wait and get hands on with it before jumping to conclusions based on watching a video.
You said it has poor contrast.. he proved, with evidence, that statement was false. How could that be irrelevant?What you showed is irrelevant. The G5 display looks like garbage compared to the screens in that comparison and pretty much everyone would agree.
heres a drop test of the phone. I
m not liking that the back pops off so easily