I'm in the fortunate position of not having shelled out any money for a case or a screen protector while having a Moto E XT1022 that is less than a week old . For those of you with the benefit of hindsight after having gone through multiple protector brands from multiple manufacturers, would it be worth it to get both a tempered glass protector and put the Power Support MMTE-02 Non-Glare over it? I'm thinking the original screen would be protected from cuts, general wear, and impacts by the secondary tempered glass surface (which wouldn't work as well as the Shock Absorbing model, but at least the secondary glass would break instead of the original screen; for me, there's not much point in protecting the original screen if you can't use the touch surface effectively). The film would protect the secondary glass from the brunt of impacts, like the video demonstration on Power Support's site shows (albeit less so than the Shock Absorbing Model).
Here's a big comparison list between cases and screen protectors (just for the Moto E; I'm probably going to upgrade to a Moto X when Republic Wireless gets their act together to support the newer hardware).
I have a spreadsheet linked on my Google Plus profile (which goes by the different name of "Joey Buddy") where you can see a list with about 35 different entries for case and screen protector comparisons. I can't link it because of my raw newbness in these forums, but it might be handy for others looking for cases on the sturdier end of the shopping spectrum.
I'm thinking a i-Blason Prime for the case (the XT1021 and XT1022 don't have any exterior case differences from what I can tell), a Fatax 0.2mm Ultra-thin 9H Glass Screen Protector, and then a Power Support Non-Glare film layered on that (which, weirdly enough, is the most expensive accessory out of the three items). So what do you think, overkill, not enough, wrong direction?