- Mar 24, 2012
- 66
- 0
- 0
We had a phone stolen months ago, we were told to suspend it "without billing" (which still charged for the device subsidy, fair enough), but that only lasts 3 months at which point you can only suspend it again "with billing" which charges you for the full talk&text service even though we can't use the phone and there's been 0 texts and 0 minutes used on it since it was stolen.
Can someone explain the logic behind charging for service that can't be used and wasn't used one bit? What are we paying for if not that? We're paying for a service that we can't and didn't use. That seems unfair and should be illegal. Is it illegal? Verizon will not credit any of it, and we've been with them for over 5 years (around $3000 a year, maybe around $15,000 total, with tablets, and this phone will be $70 per month until September).
What are Europe's laws about this? Are phone companies allowed to charge for service that can't be and aren't being used?
Can someone explain the logic behind charging for service that can't be used and wasn't used one bit? What are we paying for if not that? We're paying for a service that we can't and didn't use. That seems unfair and should be illegal. Is it illegal? Verizon will not credit any of it, and we've been with them for over 5 years (around $3000 a year, maybe around $15,000 total, with tablets, and this phone will be $70 per month until September).
What are Europe's laws about this? Are phone companies allowed to charge for service that can't be and aren't being used?