fr4nk1yn
Well-known member
Perhaps I was hallucinating? I did have peyote that day.the mind sees what you want it to...
To some extent I agree. But they will pay if they want the device and the iPhone is an example of that.HTC and Sprint are not Apple.
My point on fees is not related to WHO is charging them but that they are being charged and that will shut off consumers faster than anything. It created the impression of a lack of value and it creates confusion about the true cost of the phone/Sprint service.
I personally don't care about the $10, Call it what you want, tax/fee, I rather enjoy watching all the folks complain about not being able to put gas in their car or feed their family because of it. AT&T and VZ have both made data mandatory on smartphone or "media devices". This is where the industry is going. Sprint is LATE on this, it'll be on more device soon enough. But yeah it is creating confusion and Sprint is not explaining it "correctly", Again back to Sprint's horrible PR.
If you read the leaked photo the $5 charge is to be paid through PayPal, NOT through Sprint. They most certainly will know or at least should if they don't jump to conclusions.yea, but most people won't know the difference. I bet you that if you sign up for the Qik service, it will show up on your sprint bill (like ringtones, etc). Most users won't know the difference and blame Sprint for it