adamgalas1
Well-known member
A few points.
1. I'm not sure if it's just me but the low light picks they show in these reviews look fine to me.
I have no idea what washed out colors or noise means and I think that most non tech people, who review dozens of phones per year, won't be bothered by its camera.
That's based on customer reviews from previous moto x in amazon.
2. I'm so sick and tired of every reviewer labeling. The big screen a con. It's one of the main features of the phone.
Reviewers seen to forget that no one who hates big phones will ever even pick the xpe up, much less buy it.
Yes, you may have to use it for a week to review it as your job but just because you have small hands and hate phablet s doesn't mean you should ***** about the main feature of the device.
It's as if I reviewed the Xperia z 5 compact and complained about the 4.6 inch screen feeling cramped.
To people who are drawn to that phone the tiny screen is the big draw.
Or how about the s pen on the note 5? I personally don't find it useful and so is unnecessary for me, just something to lose.
But it's also the defining feature of the damned phone so how fair would it be for me to review the phone and complain about it?
Or how about if I was someone who never used replaceable batteries or SD cards and then attacked the LG g4 for having this things, claiming that a totally sealed design is superior and I just don't get why every phone doesn't have that and forgo SD cards.
Phone Reviewers need to keep in mind that key features of a phone are that, features.
No one who actually buys a nexus 6 does it despite the giant screen but exactly because they want a giant screen.
So claiming that the large size may be too big for some is asinine.
Who reviews a Ferrari and then lists poor fuel economy as a con?
Or reviews a Bently and then says "may be outside some readers price range".
Yeah, no ****, sherlock, and the downside of swimming is that it may be too wet for some.
1. I'm not sure if it's just me but the low light picks they show in these reviews look fine to me.
I have no idea what washed out colors or noise means and I think that most non tech people, who review dozens of phones per year, won't be bothered by its camera.
That's based on customer reviews from previous moto x in amazon.
2. I'm so sick and tired of every reviewer labeling. The big screen a con. It's one of the main features of the phone.
Reviewers seen to forget that no one who hates big phones will ever even pick the xpe up, much less buy it.
Yes, you may have to use it for a week to review it as your job but just because you have small hands and hate phablet s doesn't mean you should ***** about the main feature of the device.
It's as if I reviewed the Xperia z 5 compact and complained about the 4.6 inch screen feeling cramped.
To people who are drawn to that phone the tiny screen is the big draw.
Or how about the s pen on the note 5? I personally don't find it useful and so is unnecessary for me, just something to lose.
But it's also the defining feature of the damned phone so how fair would it be for me to review the phone and complain about it?
Or how about if I was someone who never used replaceable batteries or SD cards and then attacked the LG g4 for having this things, claiming that a totally sealed design is superior and I just don't get why every phone doesn't have that and forgo SD cards.
Phone Reviewers need to keep in mind that key features of a phone are that, features.
No one who actually buys a nexus 6 does it despite the giant screen but exactly because they want a giant screen.
So claiming that the large size may be too big for some is asinine.
Who reviews a Ferrari and then lists poor fuel economy as a con?
Or reviews a Bently and then says "may be outside some readers price range".
Yeah, no ****, sherlock, and the downside of swimming is that it may be too wet for some.