Let's assume you're right. Verizon has a legal team deeper than all of the Major League Baseball's infield. Compared to the resources of the typical forum reader...you think someone like you, me, and the most die-hard forum reader is going to come out ahead in a lawsuit with Verizon? Suing over a service that isn't even owned by a customer? Yeah...
I'm not going to sue Verizon for a service I don't own (though I'll join a class-action...why not?!) I'd rather just avoid the headache altogether and just use the "legal" loophole of the alternate upgrade, which I have heard is doable by not one, but TWO Verizon reps. Believe me, if I thought this thing was doable, I'd have been one of the many doing the upgrade on my line, but I figured a rumor, a glitch or whatever was not worth the risk.
Upgrading a dummy line for $240 plus the cost of a hot phone like the Note 3? That's an acceptable risk!
I never said to not use the right way? I'm a fan of buying my phones 100% so I'm not against it. I'm just saying regardless of sueing or not you cannot sell something in this country than change it later as you feel.. That's bait and switch. If it was as easy as just having lawyers to pull off a bait and switch then all major companies could do it and own all of us by that logic.. Since we couldn't go against them as you say since they have the field a of lawyers.
Again.. It's illegal. They can't and won't do it. They will either change your plan by notifying you if you chose to not return the phone and buy it outright... IF they even go as far as to try and reverse it.
Sent from my T-Mobile HTC One using AC Forums.