Re: Am I the only one here disappointed with this phones performa
Lol...what a massive rationalization that the Evo 3d just falls short in the camera and gaming department!.
Compare your pics to the Iphone....then compare playing a game to say the Nexus....then come back...and just say: 'yeah, these features can be much better on the 3d"... I mean...its ok. The 3d still kicks ass... Gohead.
To simply say, it's a phone is an injustice beyond description. I used "just a phone" in the early 90's. THAT was a phone, this device has the specs of a high end netbook or even a low grade laptop. Expectations should be high and if some people (myself included) feel as if they missed the target than that is on the manufacturer, not the consumer.[/QUOTE]
Lol...what a massive rationalization that the Evo 3d just falls short in the camera and gaming department!.
Compare your pics to the Iphone....then compare playing a game to say the Nexus....then come back...and just say: 'yeah, these features can be much better on the 3d"... I mean...its ok. The 3d still kicks ass... Gohead.
I work for the government and I can tell, if what we have are supercomputers, then we are all doomed lol. Seriously though, having realistic expectations about a device is not so far fetched. I mean, the OP is trying to run games, available in the Android Market, on his top end Android phone. I can see if he was trying to run PS3 games on it. Obviously, it is not that kind of gaming device. Same as your camera reference, no it should not take DSLR quality photos but, should it be able to take usable ones? Be comparable to a device with less specs and a year older (such as the iPhone 4)? At the minimum, it should be more than capable of running the software that was developed for it or even lesser devices.I understand your point about devices like this these being mutlifunction devices, not just phones anymore and you're correct. However, the primary purpose is communication - talk, text, email, Facebook, twitter etc. It is a phone 1st, the rest of what it can do is secondary.
the fact that these are converged devices means something has to give somewhere. As great as technology is these days i think to expect to merge so much (phone,computer, ebook, camera,mp3,gaming,etc) into one small package and expect full functionality from each component is a bit unreasonable. And stand alone device will handle its dedicated task better than a device trying to do its job and a hundred others. As good as iPhone or nokia phone cameras may be, they're not gonna hold a candle to a canon or Nikon dslr camera. A car may have decent rear cargo room and a trailer hitch, but does that mean I should take it to a construction site and expect it to haul lumber and concrete etc as well as a diesel powered pickup truck that was designed for such tasks? Of course not.
Lastly, I don't believe saying "its a phone" is a copout. I believe its a reminder to put things in perspective and temper your expectations. Yes it is capable of a lot, but at the end of the day Its a phone, not a home PC or a government supercomputer. Its a phone.
To simply say, it's a phone is an injustice beyond description. I used "just a phone" in the early 90's. THAT was a phone, this device has the specs of a high end netbook or even a low grade laptop. Expectations should be high and if some people (myself included) feel as if they missed the target than that is on the manufacturer, not the consumer.[/QUOTE]