Mooncatt
Ambassador
- Feb 23, 2011
- 11,053
- 786
- 113
Honestly I just wish that people would stop thinking this was even remotely an environmental move, or that these companies are being altruistic with the move to take things out of the box. Folks giving Apple and Samsung props just irks me because it means the propaganda worked, and they're getting over on the public. That turns my stomach.
I know I've made some of those environmental arguments, but I'm actually more in agreement with your view. I do a lot of debating, and one thing I've picked up over the years is the ability to see, and thus argue from an opposing viewpoint. Being the Devil's advocate has become a hobby for me. Often times it helps pick out holes in arguments. For example:
But here's the thing...they're still making the chargers! Just because it's sitting in the store, it doesn't mean it doesn't have a footprint. They're making the same amount of product, you just have to buy it separately now. Same deal with the box. It takes up less space on a truck...but that only means they can fit more boxes. Guess what? More boxes means more product.
Companies like Apple are doing this to save on their bottom line. So why would they continue to make the same amount of chargers to just sit on shelves never to be used? Sure, people will still buy chargers, but they are no longer necessary for a large number of people that keep using old ones, and a lot of those needing new ones will go third party anyway. So the number of chargers Apple sells will be nowhere near the number of actual phones sold. So why would they waste money producing product they know for a fact will never sell?
Companies these days have drastically cut down on warehousing. In trucking, a lot of freight is shipped as "just in time," meaning they schedule deliveries to come in just before the product is needed. There's a reason trucks are sometimes called warehouses on wheels, and a single delayed shipment can cause an entire plant to shut down. So even if Apple wanted to waste the money to produce chargers destined for the scrap heap, it's unlikely that will have the warehousing space for them without incurring additional costs in expanding warehousing capacity. They can't just waste even more money shipping them to the stores, because the stores have limited storage space as well.
So no, I firmly disagree that they will make the same amount of chargers at this point. The primary driver may be financial, but it is undeniable that producing less will have a net positive environmental impact.