Apple's injunction on the Nexus; UN hosting mobile patent talks.
- Thread starter zkSharks
- Start date
lpt2569
Well-known member
- Feb 1, 2011
- 1,355
- 91
- 48
Yeah, we (flashers and the like) won't get it just like other OTA's. If you wish to accept it, revert everything back to stock, including your recovery.
Accept what?
sent from my contraband gnex
ultravisitor
Well-known member
- Aug 29, 2010
- 2,788
- 238
- 0
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
And I'm sure the original search function will be built back into ROMs for those who want it.
And I'm sure the original search function will be built back into ROMs for those who want it.
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
I know the LG Prada, but LG did not go through the arduous process of patenting their phone like Apple did. So it does not matter. Apple did the necessary patent work to protect their phone and now that the patents are being issued they are suing those who are infringing on the patents.
MS also sued Google and they settled for royalties on each Android phone sold. MS makes more money off of Android than it makes off of its own mobile OS. I am pretty damn certain that if Apple was infringing on MS patents, then MS would be suing them as well. They sued Google for infringement, then why would they not sue Apple. You make it seem that MS is playing nice and Apple is not. Apple is not interested in a licensing agreement with Google. MS was interested and they settled and made good money.
I am pretty sure that had MS had a patent on the original Surface, then they would have sued Apple already. Again, they sued Google and made millions, so why not sue Apple for a licensing agreement and do the same.
I know the LG Prada, but LG did not go through the arduous process of patenting their phone like Apple did. So it does not matter. Apple did the necessary patent work to protect their phone and now that the patents are being issued they are suing those who are infringing on the patents.
MS also sued Google and they settled for royalties on each Android phone sold. MS makes more money off of Android than it makes off of its own mobile OS. I am pretty damn certain that if Apple was infringing on MS patents, then MS would be suing them as well. They sued Google for infringement, then why would they not sue Apple. You make it seem that MS is playing nice and Apple is not. Apple is not interested in a licensing agreement with Google. MS was interested and they settled and made good money.
I am pretty sure that had MS had a patent on the original Surface, then they would have sued Apple already. Again, they sued Google and made millions, so why not sue Apple for a licensing agreement and do the same.
craigrn16
Well-known member
- Oct 7, 2010
- 622
- 18
- 0
Did you guys see this article. Seems like trouble for Google glass before it even comes out.
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/07/apple-patent-hud-display
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Android Central Forums
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/07/apple-patent-hud-display
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Android Central Forums
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
So....Apple doesnt even have a working product for this....and might can use it as ammo against Google for Glass....
If Apple isnt considered a patent troll.......I dont know what is.....this is getting really ridiculous.
So....Apple doesnt even have a working product for this....and might can use it as ammo against Google for Glass....
If Apple isnt considered a patent troll.......I dont know what is.....this is getting really ridiculous.
craigrn16
Well-known member
- Oct 7, 2010
- 622
- 18
- 0
At least this worked in our favor
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18709232
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Android Central Forums
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18709232
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Android Central Forums
Johnly
Retired Moderator
- Oct 6, 2010
- 4,916
- 319
- 0
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
That is half true. The hardware is fine, for the most part. The UI is what is so damn similar, right? Now is a great opportunity for someone to innovate something fresh....something new, something DIFFERENT!
That is half true. The hardware is fine, for the most part. The UI is what is so damn similar, right? Now is a great opportunity for someone to innovate something fresh....something new, something DIFFERENT!
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
My post was mainly addressing this:
Not talking about what they patented....or the energy they put into patenting...talking about prior art....unless Apple filed that patent before 2004.
And the Prada was an all touch screen phone, no keyboard. The Prada was already shown before Jan 2008....so whatever was in that magazine in Jan 2008 doesnt mean anything.
Alot of ppl think popularity = innovation. It doesnt. I give Apple credit for good products.....but some folks like to put them on the highest of pedestals.....when in reality they are like any company. How is the iPhone or iPad considered so innovative...wihen the orig Surface tablet was shown years before either one? And the LG Prada was out before the iPhone? Patents or no patents....just talking about technology in use before either one was out.
So the way you make it....it doesnt matter what technology was in use before the iPhone or iPad...as long as they patent it...and get the patents...( crazy as that sounds)....they have the right to sue anyone for it?
Like I said on another forum....THANK GOD they are not in any other industry...we would all be screwed.
My post was mainly addressing this:
Not talking about what they patented....or the energy they put into patenting...talking about prior art....unless Apple filed that patent before 2004.
And the Prada was an all touch screen phone, no keyboard. The Prada was already shown before Jan 2008....so whatever was in that magazine in Jan 2008 doesnt mean anything.
Alot of ppl think popularity = innovation. It doesnt. I give Apple credit for good products.....but some folks like to put them on the highest of pedestals.....when in reality they are like any company. How is the iPhone or iPad considered so innovative...wihen the orig Surface tablet was shown years before either one? And the LG Prada was out before the iPhone? Patents or no patents....just talking about technology in use before either one was out.
So the way you make it....it doesnt matter what technology was in use before the iPhone or iPad...as long as they patent it...and get the patents...( crazy as that sounds)....they have the right to sue anyone for it?
Like I said on another forum....THANK GOD they are not in any other industry...we would all be screwed.
Last edited:
Speedygi
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2011
- 431
- 34
- 28
Then why did Google not sue Apple for ripping off their notification bar, and RIM not suing Apple for ripping off BBM?
Get the Iphone Impeached and banned from selling within the USA, simple, case closed. Samsung withdraw your materials from the Iphone. Google remove all properties from the Iphone as well.
Under normal business circumstances as many have stated, those should have been done?
Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums
Get the Iphone Impeached and banned from selling within the USA, simple, case closed. Samsung withdraw your materials from the Iphone. Google remove all properties from the Iphone as well.
Under normal business circumstances as many have stated, those should have been done?
Sent from my HTC One X using Android Central Forums
Last edited:
sicario666
Well-known member
- Dec 27, 2009
- 2,931
- 366
- 83
craigrn16
Well-known member
- Oct 7, 2010
- 622
- 18
- 0
Yup. They can now sue Google for Glass and they don't even have a product yet. It's Google's fault though. They should have patented the tech when they thought of it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Android Central Forums
Johnly
Retired Moderator
- Oct 6, 2010
- 4,916
- 319
- 0
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
For the ages, all you ever need is a blue print. hasn't changed man.
For the ages, all you ever need is a blue print. hasn't changed man.
- Mar 15, 2011
- 2,012
- 75
- 0
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
The Verge posted an interesting article, and updated it after hearing back from Google.
Galaxy Nexus no longer available to purchase from Google Play website, will return next week
The Verge posted an interesting article, and updated it after hearing back from Google.
Galaxy Nexus no longer available to purchase from Google Play website, will return next week
Johnly
Retired Moderator
- Oct 6, 2010
- 4,916
- 319
- 0
Re: "Apple lands preliminary ban against Samsung Galaxy Nexus."
Time to game, remember final fantasy 3? Time to game MF.
Time to game, remember final fantasy 3? Time to game MF.
Speedygi
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2011
- 431
- 34
- 28
Similar threads
- Locked
Trending Posts
-
PERMANENTLY disable wifi to switch to mobile data on INFINIX phone
- Started by stonefruit
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram