ProCapture is the most DSLR-like in its layout and controls, and goes the furthest out in terms of ISO, but I found that in a single, one shot comparison of a low light subject, Camera FX edged it out slightly in terms of quality (to my eyes). FV-5 was slightly behind either by a small margin but all three were without question far better than stock.
I posted the shots in the lengthy thread asking who thought that the camera sucked (toward the very end). It's a very small and limited sample admittedly, but it represents conditions that test the limits of the camera. You can look at them and decide for yourself. Keep in mind that photos posted to the forum will suffer from some compression simply from posting so the real results, so the originals are a little better, but they all suffer equally from the compression so you have a basis for comparison.
The biggest difference between the camera phone and the DSLR/quality portable other than the obvious lens/sensor quality is the choice of exposure parameters that the phone is forced to make because of the size or lens and sensor. Whereas my Panasonic GF1/1.7 prime 20 mm combo (a great 4/3 machine and lens) chose 1/15 at 800 ISO for the same scene, the Note 3 various camera apps and stock generally had to go 1/10 at 1600 ISO. There's just no way to get around that when you're shooting with almost a pinhole camera, as you indicate. But any of those three apps can produce very good photos considering. ..
Posted via Android Central App
I just started using Camera FV-5. I love the interface. Very good so far.
Another vote for camera fv-5, very DSLR like interface wise.
Ok but is the Note 3's annoying intermittent paint brush effect bug gone with this app?
Posted via Android Central App
The vast majority of people who use a smartphone camera are not going to be adjusting ISO,shutter speed and EV before they take a photo.The moment will be gone by the time they get the settings right.Most people won't have the patience either.
So which app has the best auto mode?I give the thumbs up to ProCapture.It goes all the way up to ISO1600 so the auto mode is good for day and night shots.Some other apps does this also but I have found ProCapture to be less noisy at ISO1600 yet doesn't have that oil painting effect.
How does photos look at ISO1600 with FV5 compared to ProCapture?This is really the acid test as most apps do well in good lighting.You are correct, I was answering OP question, he stated he has a D7000 so I assumed he would be after more control than the stock camera app gives, and I find that camera fv-5 does fine in auto mode also.
How does photos look at ISO1600 with FV5 compared to ProCapture?This is really the acid test as most apps do well in good lighting.
I have compared ProCapture with Zoom FX and prefer the former.Photos maybe slightly less detail as there is more noise reduction but they are less noisy and grainy.This is personal preference of course and another person might prefer more detail at the expense of more noise.
If you are after full manual control,then you can't go past FV5.It's the only app that allows control of shutter speed.
You are correct, I was answering OP question, he stated he has a D7000 so I assumed he would be after more control than the stock camera app gives, and I find that camera fv-5 does fine in auto mode also.
The oil painting effect is the result of the smart stabilisation mode.It appears to have very aggressive noise reduction and the result is an over processed look.I would turn it off unless you don't mind that effect and it seems a lot of people don't mind as long as the photo is bright enough and noise free.Mmm, somewhat, I'm mainly looking to get rid of that pesky occasional painted look that the note 3 camera has.
Posted via Android Central App