- Feb 6, 2017
- 96,250
- 11,869
- 113
Top notch screen....of course!
Where else would you put the notch?
Lol....very good display

They could put it on top and bottom like developer settings lol
Top notch screen....of course!
Where else would you put the notch?
Yeah I can agree on overall phone 2018 note 9
Pixel 3 does have a top notch screen now and speaker's
3XL has a top notch screen. 3 not so much.
And my speakers are grainy. They're loud, but grainy.
I have the 3XL.So you have the regular 3 not 3xl?
For full disclosure, these are Anandtech's recommendations for the current 2018 holiday season. Note that they do mention the current prices and outstanding value some phones offer.
View attachment 296203
If those prices are correct, a Galaxy S9 for $520 and a Galaxy S9+ for $640, then I would have to agree with anandtech for calling the S9/S9+/note 9 line the phones of the year. That's an incredible piece of hardware for those prices.
Regarding Android 9.0 reviews, the only one that I would even begin to label as thorough is Ron Amadeo's review over at Ars Technica. His review at least attempts to be thorough at 19,000 words, and you would think that would be enough, but while he's closer than anyone else he still misses the mark a bit. Ron is close to being great, but still allows his personal feelings to bleed too much into otherwise great work.
I can nit pick about stuff on this phone but I can also do that on my other phones to.
If anything, I now take The Verge reviews with a large grain of salt. Their 'demonstration' of how to build a PC has now made me question everything they look at in terms of technology.So who do you guys trust as good reviewers? Ones that put the Pixel 3 and 3XL ahead of all others based on them subjectively having the best cameras even if they lack other hardware features other OEMs are implementing and are overpriced? The big YouTube reviewers also placed other phones ahead of it as their POYs as well (MKBHD, AA, Mr. Mobile, Dave Lee, etc.) such as the Note 9, Mate 20 Pro, and OP 6T. Pixel wins some awards for having the best camera but rarely best overall package.
Most people in these types of nerd forums vote with their wallets as most cannot buy more than one phone anyway to do proper long-term comparisons. So they are always partial to their own phones.
The Reader's Choice poll done by AC (not the editors which others have already said are non-credible) also have the Note 9 first for what it's worth and sure you can poo-poo the validity of that poll too.
https://www.androidcentral.com/best-2018-awards-your-phone-year
It's subliminally creating neural responses similar to those molded by crack.Regardless what these Youtubers/reviewers are saying , I know one thing stock andriod on Nexus/pixels once you have a taste of it and leave it for a bit you always want to come back to it . I know they have some bugs and didn't hit all the spots with the fans but hopefully they do that next year. Everytime I use this device it's a pleasure. I can nit pick about stuff on this phone but I can also do that on my other phones to.
It's subliminally creating neural responses similar to those molded by crack.
What I look for is consensus agreement on likes, dislikes and potential problems, with the understanding that no device is going to be perfect. Once you learn to block out the natural (but sometimes blinding) fanboyism, the combo of professional reviews and user experiences gives a pretty good sense the strengths, weaknesses and oddities of devices.
Interesting approach.. How do you parallel your use case with others as they can be so different from person to person. Also, do you look at things like user reviews from Best Buy or Amazon or things like that?
Like Best Buy user reviews are showing 4.6/5 for the Pixel 3/XL. Does that come into play or no?
It's subliminally creating neural responses similar to those molded by crack.
Re paralleling my use vs others comments - I pay attention to comments on features and/or usage similar to my interests, but don't ignore other types of comments too. Really, first and foremost I pay attention to flaws, bugs or other real life usage problems that I should avoid (at least til remedied)*. Those things are usually revealed first in forums like this, not in professional reviews. Of course, if I'm not really in the market to buy the device I'll likely skip the forums entirely and just use pro reviews for general interest info.
I gotcha! When I read this, what popped in my mind was hotel reviews. A person might be planning a trip and looking for insight as about a few places. Look at a hotel you really like, at they might say avoid the sw corner. Anything below the third floor shakes from the powerful AC units located below .. or whatever. Pictures and the brochures might look nice, but the actual people provide more insight.
I gotcha! When I read this, what popped in my mind was hotel reviews. A person might be planning a trip and looking for insight as about a few places. Look at a hotel you really like, at they might say avoid the sw corner. Anything below the third floor shakes from the powerful AC units located below .. or whatever. Pictures and the brochures might look nice, but the actual people provide more insight.
Regarding Android 9.0 reviews, the only one that I would even begin to label as thorough is Ron Amadeo's review over at Ars Technica. His review at least attempts to be thorough at 19,000 words, and you would think that would be enough, but while he's closer than anyone else he still misses the mark a bit. Ron is close to being great, but still allows his personal feelings to bleed too much into otherwise great work.