Only thing "cutting edge" with the g3 would be the screen. Same processor as other flagships that came out months before, same amount of ram as the z2 and note 3, the design is nice, yes, but not really cutting edge in regards to that either.
What about that cutting edge "thought" take specs out of it as other than the screen yes they are the same.
What about effort? That Lg opted for laser autofocus? Which works but with me saying that there will be one saying otherwise, such is the nature of all things and that is fine by me.
Whilst you may not agree with me and I don't expect or believe all would "I'm not that arrogant"
As a tech enthusiast like myself I see positives in all phones released thus far.
Some more than others though.
I believe Lg with reducing those bezels and making this 5.5" device fit comfortably in hand (yes again not all will find this) but they made effort, as they did with design and implementation of plastics.
Define your cutting edge what would that be?
A projector built in?
Battery tech hasn't advanced enough yet hence all OEM's opting for ways to conserve
Press a button and your phone transforms into a spaceship perhaps?
No the G3 is not perfect and it won't appeal to everyone.
But is it a great device? Yes,
Is the build great? Yes
Are the features useful? Yes
It will all depend on ones likes and dislikes.
I dislike the S5 as I don't like the lacklustre design, the camera in lowlight, don't see the point in the heart rate monitor ect. But is it a good smartphone for some yes it is and I like some of the other features, but for me I couldn't purchase it as I wouldn't be happy.
So each to their own but features on the S5 were cutting edge, as with the M8 and oppo, one plus ect.
Posted via Android Central App