Yeah you can but they want you to pay for it, that's the whole point of rooting.
Sent from my LG-VM670 using Tapatalk
Exactly.Ill say it again, it is a cover their ass clause.
Yeah you can but they want you to pay for it, that's the whole point of rooting.
Sent from my LG-VM670 using Tapatalk
Yep and the new terms of service is saying we don't want your welfare collecting not gonna pay me nuttin rooting ass using tethering without payin for it no mo.. Being the capitalist I am I respect VM for doing that now and giving me fair warning which is a lot me than you will get most places..
I use to be able to smoke a cig after din dins in a diner but no more.. I knew then I'd lost some of my freedom and it would get much worse and it has.. I will die a free man..
My suggestion is to learn Chinese as that appears to be the form of government and business model the current administration enveys and I suspect the next admin will too and this action comes as no surprise with commie boy running the show now.. I mean we can't have the children using the phone with out permission can we?? I just wish Marxist meant bad ppl with magic markers.. Sadly it's way worse than that..
It's not just the tethering, I think Rom Manager bricking all of those phones also plays a big role in the TOS change. I wouldn't be surprised if some customers returned bricked phones or messed up ones with modified recoveries installed & such, and caused this "change". I understand voiding of warranty, but cutting off service is somewhat of an extreme move to make.
Sent from my LG-VM670 using Tapatalk 2
*Entering hacker mode*
I'm guessing they can find this out by what someone else said in the thread, by pinging the phone or nmaping the phone to see:
1. What the OS is running on the Phone.
2. If the phone responds to a su command.
3. If any there is any missing OEM software.
When a phone is off, it will not respond to a ping request, when your missing THE app, it will not respond to a ping request. So logically, they are gonna have multiple apps to verify if the phone has a root or not. So in theory you could emulate that the phone is off by using some type of firewall on android, and blocking any applications that have direct access to Vm's network.
Now you could argue that they might shut you off because, you are using your services when the phone should be "off". So if they do shut you down, flash stock firmware on the device and remove root. Call back VM and get support, they will probably start asking for some type of verification, turn the firewall off and let them do it. They will see its the stock ROM without root, and you get off scott free.
Sprint and Virgin mobile does have the right to their networks, but I also have the right to use my phone as I wish. The phone is not licensed, it is bought, unless I am breaking any of their TOS for their service(And not their phone TOS), I can do anything I want. To the point where I could challenge it in court and win, because it says nothing on the phone box that it is a licensed product.
No license == No control of said phone
You just blew my mind
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus (not really) using Tapatalk 2
Relax people.
Rooting has been against the terms of service for at least a year.
Virgin Mobile Says No to Rooting
Booting a bunch of paying customers because they rooted their own phones, would be pretty stupid. How much money would they lose by doing that? Imagine the PR flap.
So long as you aren't costing them money, they aren't going to spend money to stop you, besides, courts have already ruled they can't stop you from rooting.
This, and if you do root/flash custom roms or use tethering, please, just please use it for emergencies, don't tether your PS3 or your XBOX, using 20+GB's of data, because that's what really hurts all of us.
I agree, this is not really about the rooting, it's more or less about the tethering.