Folks,
Would anyone be interested in investigating whether we have a case for class action lawsuit for Samsung's policy on liquid damage? Samsung markets the S7 as IP68 and says 5 feet no more than 30 minutes. They also have TV ads that show people swimming with their phones. But when our phones fail to meet those specs and get water damage, they refuse to do anything about it because their warranty excludes all kinds of liquid damage. I don't know the applicable laws about this, but it feels false advertising and not right.
Obviously this happened to me and my interaction with Samsung has been frustrating because of their policies (the people were pretty nice).
Would anyone be interested in investigating whether we have a case for class action lawsuit for Samsung's policy on liquid damage? Samsung markets the S7 as IP68 and says 5 feet no more than 30 minutes. They also have TV ads that show people swimming with their phones. But when our phones fail to meet those specs and get water damage, they refuse to do anything about it because their warranty excludes all kinds of liquid damage. I don't know the applicable laws about this, but it feels false advertising and not right.
Obviously this happened to me and my interaction with Samsung has been frustrating because of their policies (the people were pretty nice).