- Jan 27, 2015
- 6
- 0
- 0
I've owned a Samsung Galaxy S5 since its release day in April 2014. In the last few days I've installed Android Lollipop 5.0. Mostly this is an attractive update, but with some minor irritations.
One was that my favourite imported (i.e. not built-in) notification sound (Message 2.aac) was no longer recognised, and, pending a fix, I apparently had to be content with one of the built-in sounds.
But I saw a way around this, which I offer to Forum readers. I already knew that any song in the Music folder could be turned into a ringtone or an alarm sound. I therefore copied Message 2.aac into the Music folder, and made it into an alarm sound (it could alternatively be made into a ringtone). That done, I deleted Message 2.aac from the Music folder.
It was now in the root directory, and Lollipop could use it not only as an alarm, but as a notification sound. Thus I got my favourite sound for incoming emails and texts up and running!
I suppose any procedure involving a built-in app that places a sound in the root directory will be the basis for a workaround. I thought readers might like to know about it. Whether it's an elegant solution is of course quite another matter!
Lucy Melford
One was that my favourite imported (i.e. not built-in) notification sound (Message 2.aac) was no longer recognised, and, pending a fix, I apparently had to be content with one of the built-in sounds.
But I saw a way around this, which I offer to Forum readers. I already knew that any song in the Music folder could be turned into a ringtone or an alarm sound. I therefore copied Message 2.aac into the Music folder, and made it into an alarm sound (it could alternatively be made into a ringtone). That done, I deleted Message 2.aac from the Music folder.
It was now in the root directory, and Lollipop could use it not only as an alarm, but as a notification sound. Thus I got my favourite sound for incoming emails and texts up and running!
I suppose any procedure involving a built-in app that places a sound in the root directory will be the basis for a workaround. I thought readers might like to know about it. Whether it's an elegant solution is of course quite another matter!
Lucy Melford