LTE in Los Angeles
- Thread starter ericizzy1
- Start date
Don't think there's any LTE switched on in LA yet. Check s4gru.com for the latest. Last I checked, there were two 4G LTE towers that had been completed (as of 8/12 or so). Looks like October rollout, maybe late September at the earliest.
Have 4g LTE 20 min. S. Of downtown Los Angeles. And it is fast.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747
LTE is 4G. It is a different technology than Wimax 4G, which is what you are calling 4G
LTE speeds will vary widely with signal strength. Sprint advertises 6-8 Mbps with peak speeds of 25 Mbps when the network buildout is completed. At the outset in any area, coverage will be more spotty. What matters is not just peak speeds, but typical speeds over the coverage area. Sprint's ultimate goal is LTE 4G wherever 3G is available today.
Last edited:
- Apr 17, 2012
- 32,273
- 23
- 38
This is a sprint forum... He isn't asking about other carriers lte lol
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Android Central Forums
On the the s2 4g I get up to 12mbs, so I don't see a reason for lte. Plus, I heard it drains your battery. Unlike regular 4g, there is no option to turn it off unless you restart your phone.
Except you don't get 12 Mbps or even 1 Mbps with Wimax where Wimax coverage does not exist. You only get 3G, and Wimax coverage is not being expanded at all. The Sprint LTE network project is architected to provide LTE eventually to just about any place that gets 3G today. It is not optimized for the highest peak speeds, but rather for moderately fast speeds delivered as consistently as possible over a larger coverage area.
If peak speeds for the sake of bragging rights in user forums are the most important thing to you, you would be better off with another carrier's LTE, not Wimax. Also, Wimax will be supported for a few years, but it will go away after 2015. But for real-world use by most people, most users running most mobile apps -- even video streaming -- really can't tell the difference between 6-8 Mbps and 12 Mbps.
As for what you have heard about LTE burning battery, I just don't believe that. I follow this LTE rollout stuff closely, and such a pattern just does not emerge in the testing reports.
Is not bragging rights. I am simply just pointing it out. I just do not want to go back to having my videos buffer every second. Honestly, I do an abundance amount of video streaming on my phone (from watching videos on ign, youtube, yahoo, tv links, and movie2k). It is pretty frustrating to try to watch a video and for it to buffer all the time or for the video to be unplayable.
I agree that video buffering is frustrating. I don't agree that you need at least 12 Mbps download to avoid buffering. A steady 2 Mbps should be sufficient for that. Your bad streaming experience was probably occurring on 3G service, and that can be pretty bad with Sprint's overburdened legacy 3G network. The 3G speeds should also improve, BTW, with the new network rebuild.
I also don't agree that 12 Mbps is the typical performance with Wimax. I get no Wimax service at home, and until recently I used my Epic 4G on Wimax at the office -- usually between 500 kbps and 4 Mbps.
- Apr 17, 2012
- 32,273
- 23
- 38
I can say in Jacksonville FL either at home or the office I got avg. 8+ Mbit on wimax when I had my galaxy s2.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Android Central Forums
Same here. I live in the Los Angeles metro area--Bellflower to be exact. It's crazy, because my 3g is just plain awful (less than 1 mbs). My 4g, however, is super fast.
Similar threads
- Question
Trending Posts
-
-
-
-
-
Touch Screen to Wake turns itself off daily
- Started by atlsport
- Replies: 1
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram