Post your benchmark results here!
- Thread starter trooper54
- Start date
- Nov 25, 2010
- 15,958
- 2,752
- 0
Comparing these two is unfair because TER is simply EXT4/Edify scripting and midNIGHT is EXT4/Edify/with no journaling mod which in this case the no journaling mod gives about a 15%-20% increase in performance.
Yes TER normally scores right in that range with Quadrant
A little note before midNIGHT added the no journaling mod it scored in about the same area as TER. Take those Quadrant scores with a grain of salt. All comes down to if your happy or not with your rom. Those scores are based on graphic testing and other things which really doesn't come into effect much for the average daily user.
Last edited:
He's right. I have Viper Rom 4.0.4 EXT4 version and I ran Quadrant Advanced (found on slideME.org) and I got 1564. As you know (or don't), Quadrant Advanced displays what contributes to your score when you get to the bar graph. I've noticed after I flashed an EXT4 ROM on my Epic, the I/O portion of the test went WAY up drastically than previously before. It is a lot like the droid x's score where the I/O is all wonky and the benchmark gives it a high score. So this just goes to show you that benchmarks can be easily manipulated!
For some reason Launcher Pro resets (as in just having to reload all my apps and widgets on the homescreens again) and takes about a 1 minute- 2 minutes to recover. This happens when I play a graphic intensive game for about 15 minutes or when I browse on the internet for 30 minutes with an average of 2-3 tabs when I am on the internet. I have seven homescreens 2 1/2 of the homscreens are covered by widgets and the rest of the space is covered by apps and folders. I also have 3 docks, all of them filled up with apps I also have a live wallpaper going on in the background
Widgets: 10
Folders: 5
Apps (on homescreen): 56
Apps (in total): 110
And also it seems like the phone lags. Like for example when I unlock the phone, the first homescreen transition stops for a second, takes a second to respond, and then continues and ALWAYS does it when I unlock my phone. And even sometimes, it takes like 5 seconds for my phone to respond when i try to open an app.
Widgets: 10
Folders: 5
Apps (on homescreen): 56
Apps (in total): 110
And also it seems like the phone lags. Like for example when I unlock the phone, the first homescreen transition stops for a second, takes a second to respond, and then continues and ALWAYS does it when I unlock my phone. And even sometimes, it takes like 5 seconds for my phone to respond when i try to open an app.
Probably two things going on here. First, of those 10 widgets, about half probably use data and will refresh after each screen lock.
As far as the launcher pro reset: this goes to the functionality of the android os. When you are doing heavy graphics use, the os dedicates the processor and ram to accomplishing that current graphics intensive task. What it is likely doing is dropping launcher pro and your widgets out of background memory to free that memory for your graphics use. Once you come back to the homescreen, it is having to relaunch from not being stored in memory, hence the lag.
To fix the lag, go back to your stock launcher and remove any widgets you may still have on those screens. Even though the launcher is not being used, those widgets will still be running. Next, try reducing your widget count on your home screens, if you can. Third, set the refresh time frame on widgets such as facebook updates, twitter, etc to a time based rule instead of on phone wake-up.
Let me know if these things help.
Sent from my Froyo Fascinate using Tapatalk.
As far as the launcher pro reset: this goes to the functionality of the android os. When you are doing heavy graphics use, the os dedicates the processor and ram to accomplishing that current graphics intensive task. What it is likely doing is dropping launcher pro and your widgets out of background memory to free that memory for your graphics use. Once you come back to the homescreen, it is having to relaunch from not being stored in memory, hence the lag.
To fix the lag, go back to your stock launcher and remove any widgets you may still have on those screens. Even though the launcher is not being used, those widgets will still be running. Next, try reducing your widget count on your home screens, if you can. Third, set the refresh time frame on widgets such as facebook updates, twitter, etc to a time based rule instead of on phone wake-up.
Let me know if these things help.
Sent from my Froyo Fascinate using Tapatalk.
Okay I'm probably gonna switch back to the launcher that was intended to be used in the first place. Plus this will probably clear up some unecessary RAM that is used by any third-party launcher. And I'm probably also going to going to get rid of a couple of widgets, mainly the ones I don't use often anymore.
- Nov 25, 2010
- 15,958
- 2,752
- 0
Quadrant scores Froyo EB13 Deodexed CWM3.0.0.6 EXT4
Just a update here...
Running Froyo EB13 deodexed/CWM3.0.0.6 EXT4/Stock Dual FS-EXT4 Kernel
I just pulled a 1457 score on Quadrant.
BTW, I am also using TER Mini Theme v1.8 with NO ISSUES!
Just a update here...
Running Froyo EB13 deodexed/CWM3.0.0.6 EXT4/Stock Dual FS-EXT4 Kernel
I just pulled a 1457 score on Quadrant.
BTW, I am also using TER Mini Theme v1.8 with NO ISSUES!
So is it just better NOT to have EB13 since I'm pulling 2086 w/midnight 3.0 on DK28 and Genoside kernel at 1ghz?
Neocore: 55.0
Linpack: 13.093
Fps2d: 54 =avg stdev = 5.53
Quadrant: 1580
Nenamark1: 50.6
Smartbench2010: Productivity=1147 Gaming=2605
Froyo EB13 deodexed/CWM3.0.0.6 EXT4/Stock Dual FS-EXT4 Kernel
I didn't do anything special before running the tests. By special I mean restarting the phone, using an app killer beforehand, etc. I ran them in order, one after the other.
Linpack: 13.093
Fps2d: 54 =avg stdev = 5.53
Quadrant: 1580
Nenamark1: 50.6
Smartbench2010: Productivity=1147 Gaming=2605
Froyo EB13 deodexed/CWM3.0.0.6 EXT4/Stock Dual FS-EXT4 Kernel
I didn't do anything special before running the tests. By special I mean restarting the phone, using an app killer beforehand, etc. I ran them in order, one after the other.
just wondering but are these I/O scores legit or is quadrant getting a false report of the scoring?
Tried out some benchmarks using Syndicate Frozen ROM.. wow- it is fast. I cant decide whether to use ACE or Syndicate- theyre both great in their own way.
Neocore: 55.7fps
Linpack: 16.624Mflops 5.04 seconds
Quadrant: 2271
Smartbench 2010: 1484 productivity; 3286 gaming (productivity only 180 shy of LG Optimus 2x, gaming 300 better!)
Smartbench 2011: 1070 productivity; 2555 gaming (gaming nearing top of even dual core devices; productivity trumped by dual cores, but tops single)
Syndicate Frozen ROM w/ Twilight Zone kernel. 1.2GHz with scaling on performance (via SetCPU).
Neocore: 55.7fps
Linpack: 16.624Mflops 5.04 seconds
Quadrant: 2271
Smartbench 2010: 1484 productivity; 3286 gaming (productivity only 180 shy of LG Optimus 2x, gaming 300 better!)
Smartbench 2011: 1070 productivity; 2555 gaming (gaming nearing top of even dual core devices; productivity trumped by dual cores, but tops single)
Syndicate Frozen ROM w/ Twilight Zone kernel. 1.2GHz with scaling on performance (via SetCPU).
Quadrant scores
What kind of scores are you rooted/custom ROM Epic users pulling? My buddys father in law said he got over 2200...kinda hard to believe, so I figured I would ask you guys.
What kind of scores are you rooted/custom ROM Epic users pulling? My buddys father in law said he got over 2200...kinda hard to believe, so I figured I would ask you guys.
Similar threads
Trending Posts
-
-
-
PERMANENTLY disable wifi to switch to mobile data on INFINIX phone
- Started by stonefruit
- Replies: 9
-
-
Back from a 10 year hiatus!
- Started by 8livesleft
- Replies: 5
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram