But they do share their results, in addition to their analysis and you can make a spreadsheet on your own and compare the values.
What you just quoted shows that your basis for your statement that the S9 is better is false, since at best, all four are equal. However my case is not based on this quote - all being visually indistinguishable from perfect does not mean that they are all equal in an absolute sense - and they are not. From a practical standpoint, they're all the same in that humans can't tell the difference. But machines can, and one is objectively better, and it is the Pixel. Use their data, do the analysis.
I'm unclear on what you think, "on time" means. Right now it's November 29th. Do 100% of S9's either already have the November update, or the ability to download it if they want it? Samsung's goal isn't even monthly updates, they have published that their goal is quarterly updates. I remember trying to help someone through trying to get updates this past spring on the S9, their device was two months behind. Exynos and Snapdragon devices get them at different times, different carriers at different times, unlocked is on its own schedule, etc.
To be clear, my definition of on time is that it's available to 100% of devices within the same calendar month as the patch is labeled. IE the April update is available by April 30th. That's similar to what you sated in your last sentence. That is Samsung's goal too on carrier versions. They routinely miss that goal on at least one of them.
And one failure to hit goal, on one version, anywhere is enough to falsify "all".
Two is one number, three is another. One is larger than the other. The first three sentences of this statement looks like you were conceding the point, but then you switched into trolling. The Pixels are always running the latest software. Pie has been publicly released for almost four months and Samsung has pushed that update, officially, to zero phones. Including the Note 9, which was released AFTER Pie.
I'm not sure where the disconnect here is.. but you are aware that Samsung isn't good at software, right? Like they had to have Google come in and help them get up to snuff on their UX, which made major improvements at that time... only to start regressing shortly afterwards. No? Ok, we can agree to disagree I suppose - but I'm going to ask again... wtf is an iPixel? Is it a straw man you're inventing? Because it's definitely not the device we're discussing. You do need to make sure we're discussing the same topic before trying to make claims for or against anything.
This statement is an obvious lie, completely out of touch with the consensus of 100% of the professional analysts and reviewers that have compared them. The hyperbole gives away the fact that you know you're saying something that no one will believe if you were to simply make it as a concise and logic based argument.
If your statement is instead that you prefer the S9 camera to the Pixel 3, well that just an opinion, and opinions are fine. But you postured your opinion as objective fact. It probably also means you don't know anything about the technology or how to use it, since the differences between the two shooters are very clear.
This is a list of issues for the Pixel 3. I asked for you to cite your sources that the iPixel is constantly crashing. Since there is no such thing as an iPixel, since you lied, you can't produce that. You said you could cite DOZENS of articles about the iPixel slowing down and crashing and also indicated that you believe the Pixel 3 has worse battery life than the S9. I asked you to cite those claims, you did not. The XDA article that you linked does not address any of those three things. You know one easy way to know that? Read the damned thing. I did. And the fact that it doesn't say what you claim it says, and that you didn't produce any of the DOZENS of sources that would back up your claim, means that your claim is not going to be accepted until you have evidence .
1) There's no such thing as an iPixel, please focus on the topic at hand. 2) If you're going to use a source, read it, understand it, and figure out whether or not it supports your argument. 3) Saying that you know something, when you don't - is misrepresenting your knowledge. That's dishonest.
This was about AI integration, and you switched it to privacy. So read through the privacy statements of the two companies. Let me know if you can tell the differences in the language.
This is false for two reasons. 1) The word "objective" does not mean "in my opinion". 2) You have no way of knowing which device is better, because you a) apparently don't know anything about the devices b) apparently don't know anything about the market c) have surveyed zero people d) wouldn't know how to analyze survey results even if you had them and d) apparently don't know that generalizations cannot be statistically applied to a number outside of two standard deviations from mean without having sufficient evidence to justify that extreme conclusion.
You could have said, "I think more people prefer Samsung's experience over Google's" and that's an honest statement, and probably what you would have said if you were attempting to be honest. But you instead lied twice in one sentence.
I don't know what an iPixel is, so I can't say if you're correct about this or not. Since I'm pretty sure it doesn't exist, I would have to conclude that you're incorrect. If you are instead talking about the Pixel 3, and stating that it excels at nothing - then apparently you haven't heard about it's reputation for camera, updates, software, etc. Whether or not you agree that you enjoy these things more than you enjoy Samsung's implementation is up to you - but to pretend that you're unaware of the positive qualities of a device, simply because you hate it - is dishonest.
We've already discussed a number of things that falsify this statement, prior to you making it.
Last two points.
1) The OP already made their decision. None of this matters except for point 2
2) We all, the readers of this sub, know that you're lying. Not that you're mistaken, but that you are deliberately trying to deceive and are knowingly making claims that are false. If you think that everyone should just sit back and let you lie all day and not respond to it, that's not how this works. There are very few members that I will state are being dishonest, rather than being mistaken. I won't say that you are lying unless I can prove that I know you know something is false or that I know you have access to information that would allow you to quickly determine whether or not a claim is substantiated. Furthermore, your reputation as a liar precedes you from the blog. This kind of nonsense that you're doing here is not going to be tolerated or respected.
So I'm sure were' going to do this again, but I hope we're not. I'd much rather spend time with honest people, discussing things in good faith, even when we disagree.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram