Rant about SPECS!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The screen size for the Samsung galaxy s4 is 5 inches, not far off. It makes a difference. It's amazing how mad you guys get when facts are pointed out. It's like trying to tell a baby the TV isn't magic and you guys are defending it is

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app

Improvements in display quality (saturation, white level, color balance, etc.) aren't necessarily directly related to resolution. Actually, they probably aren't related at all.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
 
well its an amazing choice because it gives a superior experience unlike S4's lag

Lag has been fixed, and even then it's still a better choice than the Moto X. You started it, for the record. Now it's a hate bash on phones. And there's custom roms and a Google edition which is awesome. So, if I may, stfu

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app
 
No, we're not going to hate bash phones. This thread is heated enough.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
 
Improvements in display quality (saturation, white level, color balance, etc.) aren't necessarily directly related to resolution. Actually, they probably aren't related at all.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4

Never said they were. I'm saying the better resolution provides a better viewing experience.

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app
 
Lag has been fixed, and even then it's still a better choice than the Moto X. You started it, for the record. Now it's a hate bash on phones. And there's custom roms and a Google edition which is awesome. So, if I may, stfu

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app

so it was not hate bash on phones before?? LOL what happened you got hurt when i talked about S4 lag??
so, if i may, you should stfu.
 
Once again, I'll explain it again. It's sub-par for the asking price. The screen is 720p instead of 1080p, the processor is outdated, the phone itself isn't amazing. It's fast certainly, I mean Its a good phone. Just not for the money they're asking. It's sub-par for the amount of money they're asking

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app

Value is in the mind of the beholder and you are falling into the footsteps of those spec guys that immediately use that argument. I don't judge it by whether it costs $50 more than another, or $50 less. My judgement lies in the utility of the device compared to another. The S4 seems high to me because it added no value over the S3 unless you like gimmicks and many do...I guess Moto could put in a much larger battery, a faster clockspeed processor, layer up some more software on top of android, etc. and offer a heavier, bigger, phone that still offered the practical utility of the X with the same performance of the X from an user stance, but, compared to the current X, I would wonder what and why. I like the form factor, the lack of heat, and so on.

I don't consider it over priced or under valued.
 
so it was not hate bash on phones before?? LOL what happened you got hurt when i talked about S4 lag??
so, if i may, you should stfu.

No, I didn't get hurt. The s4 has had its lag fixed although it was an issue before. I would call you names, but I'm above that and far too intelligent to stoop to your level of understanding.

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app
 
For what activity?

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4

Typically all around, it's a sharper display. It can be noticed viewing movies, playing games, all around. This is why we have HD televisions correct? A better viewing experience and sharper video. 1080p makes a difference. You should know that, seeing you're rocking an HTC one (it's an awesome device by the way)

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app
 
No, I didn't get hurt. The s4 has had its lag fixed although it was an issue before. I would call you names, but I'm above that and far too intelligent to stoop to your level of understanding.

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app

Yeah you are intelligent. I understand that now /s
 
Value is in the mind of the beholder and you are falling into the footsteps of those spec guys that immediately use that argument. I don't judge it by whether it costs $50 more than another, or $50 less. My judgement lies in the utility of the device compared to another. The S4 seems high to me because it added no value over the S3 unless you like gimmicks and many do...I guess Moto could put in a much larger battery, a faster clockspeed processor, layer up some more software on top of android, etc. and offer a heavier, bigger, phone that still offered the practical utility of the X with the same performance of the X from an user stance, but, compared to the current X, I would wonder what and why. I like the form factor, the lack of heat, and so on.

I don't consider it over priced or under valued.

That's where differences in opinion come in. I personally like specs, where you seem to like usability and functionality. I respect that. I just think they want too much money for what is offered

Sent from my SGH-I747 using AC Forums mobile app
 
Yeah, PhoneDog noticed that the Verizon symbol in the banner was not as sharp as it is on a 1080 display
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
956,793
Messages
6,970,062
Members
3,163,625
Latest member
waleedkhankheshki