So I am about to upgrade from the original DINC to the SIII and I start to hear about radio issues with the SII.
How bad is the radio on the SII and improved will it be on the SIII?
Anyone have real tests yet from the European release of SIII?
Most likely same as nexus and they suck. But this is Samsung and there radios suck. Another reason why if its not nexus then I'm not buying Samsung phones
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
Most likely same as nexus and they suck.
Nope..will not be the same. GS3 has the S4 SoC (MSM 8960) with the radios integrated on the same chip with CPU/GPU (wifi, GPS, and BT also on-die) at 28nm. Very different setup than the 45nm OMAP with separate radios. Only time will tell if it equals an improvement over the GNex.
Droid Inc used a Snapdragon QSD 8650 SoC with modem for cellular communication on-die.
In essence... the US GS3 shares more SoC/radio heritage with the Dinc than it does with the VZW Gnex with the OMAP Soc.
Good to see someone realizes how it is completely different chipset and radios than Samsung has used in the past. On Verizon they have never used a QUALCOMM modem before, it has always been their hummingbird or the omap in the case of the nexus.
This is the reason I am excited for this phone... it has the chance to be the first LTE phone with acceptable battery life (that doesn't need a car battery.. ala Razr Max)!!!!
Most likely same as nexus and they suck. But this is Samsung and there radios suck. Another reason why if its not nexus then I'm not buying Samsung phones
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
This is the reason I am excited for this phone... it has the chance to be the first LTE phone with acceptable battery life (that doesn't need a car battery.. ala Razr Max)!!!!
For future reference the Maxx doesn't have a car battery.
I'm concerned with some of the apps i use. I got the nexus the first day and returned it the second. Could not get a solid stream for TuneIn Radio app.. praying this is better
So you had the phone 1 day and returned it? You know ICS was a new version and some apps had to be updated to work?
We won't know for sure until we have the device in hand. But this will use a Qualcomm SoC (originators of the CDMA standard) with all radios, including LTE, on the same chip. Thus its low-level firmware should be simpler and with less chance for bugs and translation errors. Not to mention that you won't have to worry about I/O bottlenecks between separate chips. The radios will use less power and have more efficient communication with the rest of the system, so yes I would expect this phone to be very good in terms of signal strength and quality.
I had a Droid Charge, and after all the issues I had Samsung themselves decided that their chips weren't ready for LTE yet. A company as successful as Samsung learns from their mistakes, and obviously Exynos 4 chips were not performing adequately with LTE, so they would logically go with the very best solution available. The Nexus doesn't really fit in to this argument, since it was designed and spec'd by Google, not Samsung, and they didn't really have CDMA in mind. Samsung pretty much had to take the Google-designed GSM version, shoehorn a CDMA/LTE radio setup in there, and hope for the best.
All that to say that I would expect the SGS3 to be more power efficient than any other LTE device so far, as well as be one of the best in terms of signal reception and quality, due to the S4 SoC. But ultimately we won't know until we get them in our hands, will we?
This is the reason I am excited for this phone... it has the chance to be the first LTE phone with acceptable battery life (that doesn't need a car battery.. ala Razr Max)!!!!
Have you seen the extended batteries attached to the back of the other 90% of smart phones out there? Making them look like that parasite looking thing in Aliens, just so you can get through a full day. You've probably sported one of these yourself beforeThose are car batteries! Most users would kill to have 3300mAh under the hood of a sub 9mm chassis but not you. You're the one in a million that thinks that is thick
LOL at ya. I happen to have an ATT GSIII in hand as we speak and it's sweet looking, I'll give it that, but it still has a way to go to prove itself to all of us in function and quality. This unit is not mine so sadly I can't power it up and take it for a spin but I can take a few snap shots of it next to my Maxx to back up what I'm saying. I challenge you to see a noticeable enough difference in thickness to make comments like that. Most will wrap it up in a bulky protective case anyway because seriously, it feels that fragile. In person I can tell that the GSIII is in fact a hair thinner but not remotely enough to make a statement such as yours. Hope you guys enjoy the photos and I apologize ahead of time for the quality of the shots. They were taken with a Blackberry! How about that, got a Slam in on a BB
![]()