Sprint or T-Mobile???
- Thread starter WildCatBBN3
- Start date
- Apr 17, 2012
- 32,273
- 23
- 38
- Apr 17, 2012
- 32,273
- 23
- 38
ubigred
Well-known member
- Jun 6, 2011
- 233
- 1
- 18
If you travel a lot, then t-mobile might be problematic. I loved T's price, but ATT's coverage is what I need.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
BradButter
New member
- May 18, 2011
- 4
- 0
- 0
If u really want to know what's best for you. Download an app called "Glove" you open it. It runs in the bg on your phone for 3 days. Then tells you in order what carriers are best for you based on you traveling those 3 days. So choose your most routine days and run it. I'm in nyc and have tmobile. Tmobile was 2nd on my list. Att was forst but the scores were 0.10 apart
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
I gotta disagree bro. I'm in Chicago right now and I my wife old sprint phone wasn't better than my Tmobile service in voice quality or speeds. At least in our areas we frequent.
Sent from my MetroPCS LG Optimus F60 using Tapatalk
AshtonKeily
Member
- Sep 3, 2015
- 8
- 0
- 0
I have to say Sprint. A. They are excellent in my area. B. Unlimited data. C. Network Aggregation is coming and is actually deployed in some areas already. Sprint is coming along. I wouldn't be surprised if they surpass T-Mobile and gain their spot back. I also hate the fact of paying for a phone monthly. Call me old school, but I love the 2yr contract.
Also if you have DirecTV sprint will give a free year of service.
Posted via the Android Central App
Also if you have DirecTV sprint will give a free year of service.
Posted via the Android Central App
Ehh, TMO can be good in any metro city.
And yeah, your problem is "I'm in Chicago right now and I my wife old sprint phone wasn't better than my Tmobile"
- Apr 17, 2012
- 32,273
- 23
- 38
Well true they are mainly a metro carrier but if that 2015 coverage map is true at the end of 2015 -- that will be a big step up in coverage from 2014.
But even with contracts, you still pay monthly for the phone. They just hide it in there. And after 2 years, you are still paying for that phone under that contract. (2 year contract w/phone $60. No contract, $40 for data, $20 for phone.) It's the same thing.
Posted via the Android Central App
HawaiiD
Well-known member
- Feb 20, 2011
- 1,184
- 19
- 38
My new T-Mobile plan(simple choice amped family unlimited) I just added 2 new lines if unlimited data to my current 2 unlimited lines. The mobile Hotspot allotment doubled to 14 GB. So thats $140.00(first 2 lines), 3rd line +$40.00, 4th free. Now the kicker... I can use my legacy corporate discount @15% with this plan. So that's $140+$40=$180 - 15%=$26.00 so that's $154.00 for 4 unlimited data lines. But as they say if the coverage with T-mobile is good in your area I'd jump on it. Even if you don't have a corporate discount? $180 for 4 unlimited lines is a great price imo.
And as for contracts? Your probably one of the few who likes that that type of deal? I'd say I could live with one year contracts if they had them?but 2 years? That is too long for me
Don't do either , go for straight talk with Verizon service and have coverage that Sprint or T-Mobile can't touch.
HawaiiD
Well-known member
- Feb 20, 2011
- 1,184
- 19
- 38
It's good option but pre paid phones aren't usually the most up to date or either current flagship ones. So if your the type who wants current flagship phones it could get pricey initially.
Moto X pure is pretty much flagship and works on any carriers including ST, so does the iPhone , Nexus 5x/6p. Nothing limits you to a prepaid phone.
Similar threads
Trending Posts
-
One UI 7, and just updates in general - why consistently remove useful features??
- Started by Rev1010
- Replies: 30
-
-
-
Question Can I change the size or format of the battery charge indicator?
- Started by gf1701
- Replies: 1
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram