I don't want to turn my reply into a rant, but I'll just shed light as to what has happened in my case.
I preordered the S3 the morning of the 5th over the web. I had tried over the phone and was instructed the only way would be to via the web. I'm ok with that, I've been with Sprint for well over 10-12 years, I've upgraded many phones, I've transitioned many family members and friends over to Sprint's network (with referral's from previous programs). Essentially, a long standing customer of Sprint.
I preordered the 16gb pebble blue on Sprints website. On my plan, there are 3 total numbers (shared everything) which I pay for my mother/father. My credit card's billing address is located at their house and I live in Manhattan.
I preordered using my Amex, put in my billing address, and put in my shipping address. My shipping address is also the address that my monthly Sprint bill is delivered to. I received email confirmation with my 'OY' order number and all is right in the world. I pinned the email up on my email account so it wouldn't get buried. On monday, I'm reading about people looking up their OY order numbers to confirm a tracking number with the expectation that it will ship (and I"ll receive it) on or before Thursday June 21st.
Upon opening the email for the first time, I noticed in the Ship and Pay area of the email to have the address of my parents place and just below it, the billing address as city apartment address. Cause for concern, a bit, but I'd give Sprint a ring.
I am transfered into Order Support who is managing the preorders and was given the following instructions. 1 - Wait until you receive a tracking number, 2 - Call back order support, 3 - Have Order Support change the shipping address to your city address.
I personally feel as if I did nothing wrong and that I shouldn't have to manage any additional part of this process. The greater part to this is, my family is currently away on vacation so no one can retrieve the package. This means it goes back into the system. Also means, I'd be getting this package after the release date which nullifies the whole reason to preorder (to get it before everyone else). Well, I'm ok with that, I don't always need to be first, but the real issue I have is that I have to spend money to travel to retrieve my package ontop of being delayed a few days for an error that wasn't done by myself.
On top of that, to add insult, I'm still paying an activation fee. Essentially, it would have been cheaper for me to not preorder and just walk in store to purchase it. But because Sprint, in partnership with Samsung, to tout it's preorder for a flagship device and hopefully pitch more future preorders by stating that preorders should expect the phone on or before June 21st gives customers the incentive to participate in the preorder program.
I get it, I understand all of it, I just don't understand why such a large company that is taking initial laydown (preorders) has a systematic issue with supply chain management. Is the system in itself, so disjointed, that you can't update an existing preorder with a shipping address that your very own system created in error? I mean, I'm not talking apples and oranges here. For one part, if the system 'swapped' both shipping and billing, then Amex should have rejected the processing of my Amex card because it's billing to the wrong address.
I'm a bit agitated at this process, I've been on with Order Support, Sr Account Executives, and 2nd level support teams for the past 2 days.
I am left with 1 - When I receive a tracking number, to call order support and have them re-route my package to another address and 2 - a claim to have my activation fee waived because of this issue which takes 72 business hours to run through the approval process.
10-12 years and I never had any 'systematic' break downs for a very simple pre-ordering process. It's simply, never happen to me and now that is has, I begin to question things like should we even expect our LTE network at the end of the year. Maybe I'm being a harsh critic to correlate each one, but in this instance I think I'm justified.