Mike Dee
Ambassador
- May 14, 2014
- 23,443
- 302
- 83
The 4 wouldn't interest me at all so assuming the 4XL battery is OK, I still see nothing to excite me or motivate me. It will have a great camera but the differences don't seem as radical and a lot depends on individual taste. The big question I have is will the video/audio be mediocre again? Smaller question: will there be any manual controls?Perceived or not, there are decisions Google could have made to eradicate any doubt. I'm not asking for Samsung-level spec-chasing. It doesn't have to be a Note 10. The Note 10 already serves that function and market, and serves it well.
The same thing happened last year with the Pixel 3 and the paltry 4GB of RAM that resulted in terrible RAM management issues during launch and even into the months after. 6GB of RAM could have easily helped prevent such an issue from being such a major sore point. Again, not asking for a crazy spec-chase. 6GB of RAM was pretty standard in 2018, both in mid-range and flagship models.
Now, with the Pixel 4, they're running the risk again with the battery size. I love the 90Hz refresh rate, but why pair that with such a small battery, especially in the smaller model? Why risk repeating another year of lackluster battery life, something the Pixel 3 models are notorious for.
Similar arguments can be made about storage options, probably pricing, and certainly, as you mention, the lack of a wide-angled lens. As MKBHD says, "gaps." Frustrating gaps...
Could Google have eliminated some of these gaps? Yes, I honestly think so. If I'm wrong, it means they can't compete, whatever those reasons may be. If I'm right, that means they don't want to compete. It feels like the latter to me.