Lack of SD card slot will have me passing again.
I need local storage, and every other manufacturer is able to handle that.
It's sure not Android Headlines, who seem hellbent on keeping the 836 rumor alive:Who said the Snapdragon 836 doesn't exist? So why does the Samsung Note 8 using the Snapdragon 836? If it doesn't exist??
It's sure not Android Headlines, who seem hellbent on keeping the 836 rumor alive:
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/07/rumor-snapdragon-836-soc-first-appear-google-pixel-2.html
I most definitely want a more consistently credible source to verify this claim before I put any energy into it myself, but it sure makes for timely clickbait, if nothing else!
Lack of SD card slot will have me passing again.
I need local storage, and every other manufacturer is able to handle that.
Reason why I skipped the Pixel, or any previous Google phones. 32GB is enough for the basic user, however advanced users like me have tons of media (ebooks, audio books, podcasts, MP3s, etc.). Cloud server? Really, so I have to spend more money on data plan? I just want my own physical storage space, not some invisible storage I can only access on wifi. Google is turning into Apple and real Android fans are shying away from them.
Yeah, they have no source for their claim. I believe they said, "unnamed industry insiders".... which is a nonsense term. So far every person who ought to know is indicating that both the Note 8 and new Pixel devices have the SD 835 in them. Test devices are already out for both devices... so it'd be pretty strange to see them switch hardware this late in the game, especially for the Note 8. The Pixel does have a little longer before shipping. But so far nothing from Qualcomm has ever indicated that they were even planning or working on an 836. All their upcoming work seems to be finishing the 845 for this upcoming spring.
Test devices. Not tests, sorry if that was unclear. Several groups of device testers now have new Pixels. I'm not against the 836, my entire point is that so far there's no evidence for it's existentce. I hope it does exist.What tests?? The one that says Pixel 2 XXL (HTC) is using Android 7.1,
Snapdragon 835, 4GB RAM, 5.6" display, slower than Samsung Galaxy S8.....is that the test you're talking about?? Are you forgetting that Pixel 2 XL is coming out Q4 2017, all premium Phones in Q4 2017 except iPhone 8 will have 6GB RAM, and YES an upgraded Snapdragon 836 (MSM 8998 Pro)
https://m.androidcentral.com/snapdr...=slider&utm_campaign=navigation&utm_source=ac
It's coming if you like it or not! Samsung is helping Qualcomm with the Snapdragon 836 to compete better against Apple A11 processeor this fall!
Just like last year with the Snapdragon 821 to compete better against the Apple A10 processeor.
As for the Snapdragon 845 witch by the way not made by Samsung anymore as they lost the contract. Qualcomm Uses TSMC’s 7nm technology to make next generation Snapdragon 845! Witch is why the first Phone this time is LG G8.
https://www.sammobile.com/2017/06/1...ung-moves-ahead-with-tsmc-for-7nm-processors/
Qualcomm shuns Samsung
Also not using Qualcomm custom Kryo CPU in the Snapdragon 845 instead there using the ARM reference Cortex A75 & A55 big.LITTLE combination like the Snapdragon 810 did. The only thing that's custom in S845 is GPU Adreno 630 & X50 5G Modem.
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/modems/5g/x50
I'm not sure why you're so against the Snapdragon 836? Google is you're friend my man.
Test devices. Not tests, sorry if that was unclear. Several groups of device testers now have new Pixels. I'm not against the 836, my entire point is that so far there's no evidence for it's existentce. I hope it does exist.
So now that the leaks are happening, what would it take for you to not upgrade to the pixel 2(xl2?)
Camera app? It comes with a camera app. And last year's Pixel camera is still better than everything Samsung and LG have released since. What other apps are missing?I don't like the stripped down stock Android experience, prefer that Samsung and LG actually load their phones with features. So knowing it will be a bare bones android experience playing catch up to Samsung is enough for me to avoid it.
Rumored lack of a headphone jack would ruin it for me as well. Pixel is a good phone, I just don't like needing a 3rd party camera and many other apps that don't come pre-installed.
Lack of SD card slot will have me passing again.
I need local storage, and every other manufacturer is able to handle that.
Due to how expensive I'm expecting the Pixel XL 2 to be, it needs to not have any major show stoppers.