JeffDenver
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 2,998
- 27
- 0
I agree. It is only Apple people that ever bring that up...I have no idea why it is relevant at all.Jesus, why are we arguing about who makes money?
I agree. It is only Apple people that ever bring that up...I have no idea why it is relevant at all.Jesus, why are we arguing about who makes money?
I agree. That still does not mean Samsung = Android. If Samsung fell off the fact of the earth, most people in the world would using smartphones would still be using Android phones.Since you want to be literal about it even though I admitted that I was NOT talking mathematically, then be that way. I will change the nomenclature to accommodate your self worth to plurality. Happy now? 40% of all Android handset makers is HUGE when the number two in the list is at 4-5%.
So what? Am I not allowed to speculate? Your response is a non-sequitur. No one here has made the argument that Apple and Samsung are not currently on top for profitshare. You are trying to argue with me over something I never denied.
I don't claim to know anything. I'm voicing an opinion, just like you are. That's the point of a forum.Not when you claim that you know the future and present your posts as if what you say WILL happen. You do not know (nor I for that matter) what will happen.
Make sure you call the police. It's the only way I'll learn.You said in your post it was ONLY hardware. Now you change it to mostly. That is a habit of yours. You present your opinion as fact, but when you are called on it, then you change the wording.
Don't ask the question if you don't want to hear the answer. There is no one-sentence answer that will explain it.I should of never asked about fragmentation on an Android forum. Lesson learned.
Profit only matters to the company and it's shareholders. No one else will care about profit.Market share is one thin and profit share is something different.
Why are there so many Android phone makers if no one else is making profit? You tell me.A company is hard pressed to sustain its growth w/o profit. LG, HTC, MOTO, are not making money. Apple has shown that it can be profitable with declining market share. Case in point, the PC/laptop market. Apple has less than 10% of the market and makes more profit than HP which has the largest market share.
Has Apple profitshare been increasing or decreasing since 2012?Same applies to the handset market SO FAR. Apple makes 62% of the profit and control only 15% of the market. The rest of the profits are taken by Samsung.
How did you determine that they get it wrong more often than not?Yes it was speculative back then to make any prediction about the future. Those who speculate sometimes get it right, but more often than not get it wrong.
I claim to have an opinion, just like you. You're not special. The rest of us get to have opinions too.The point is, you DO NOT KNOW if they will or they will not. You claim to an oracle
I disagree. In most cases, it means exactly that. Nokia and Blackberry are good examples.Just because a company loses market share does not mean it will lose profit share.
How dare I voice an opinion. lolThat is your OPINION. It is not fact.
Because this is a discussion forum. If someone makes a claim I think is wrong, I challenge them on it. Occasionally, my challenge is wrong and I learn something new. So thats why I do it.I got an answer. But then you continue to scuffle with other people on stupid things .
I don't. I was responding to claims someone else made. I personally don't think profits have anything to do with which phone is better in a given situation. I'm not a shareholder.I leaned a lot from you thank you. Why do you care who makes more money.
Then discussion is good. And we are in agreement that profit is irrelevant.We are all just trying to become informed consumers. Not unpaid employees for either Google or Apple.
I should of never asked about fragmentation on an Android forum. Lesson learned.
Posted via Android Central App
I agree. It is only Apple people that ever bring that up...I have no idea why it is relevant at all.
No, I was talking about the "profit" argument. I never bring up profits as a reason to buy a phone. It has nothing to do with anything in my opinion. Only Apple people ever bring that up.Not only Apple people, anyone who is a proponent of Android loves claiming there is a fragmentation problem. It's one of the most tired and old arguments against Android.
No, I was talking about the "profit" argument. I never bring up profits as a reason to buy a phone. It has nothing to do with anything in my opinion. Only Apple people ever bring that up.
I agree. That still does not mean Samsung = Android. If Samsung fell off the fact of the earth, most people in the world would using smartphones would still be using Android phones.
I don't claim to know anything. I'm voicing an opinion, just like you are. That's the point of a forum.
Make sure you call the police. It's the only way I'll learn.
Profit only matters to the company and it's shareholders. No one else will care about profit. Why are there so many Android phone makers if no one else is making profit? You tell me.
How did you determine that they get it wrong more often than not?
I claim to have an opinion, just like you. You're not special. The rest of us get to have opinions too.
I'm really sorry if my opinion about phone technology offends you. You'll need to find a way to get over it.
I disagree. In most cases, it means exactly that. Nokia and Blackberry are good examples.