These are complaints I see all the time. Customers need to realize that they are not always right. There is no way, if not previously shown, for them to be certain that the damage was a defect and not mishandling. That type of damage is not uncommon and can be caused by many things like jamming the plug, picking the phone up by the cord, etc. Not to say that was the case here, just showing that you need to understand their skepticism.
If customers would see, on a daily basis, the number of people that "didn't drop the phone" "didn't do anything" "didn't make that call" "didn't subscribe to that service" etc. they would have a little more understanding as to why this can go in one ear and out the other. In the end, sometimes the customer has to take some responsibility, once an issue is noticed it should be reported.
Two things to take away, 1. getting "heated" will never solve anything and actually make your situation worse, 2. one of the worst things you can do is try to leverage with how many phones you've bought, how long you have been a customer, how much you pay each month, etc each situation is different and has different guidelines to be followed and these don't do anything to change that.
/end rant
I get it, I understand it, but how Vance was treated does not make it right. I have worked customer service for a majority of my working life. Some in technical support, most in High end business travel. I understand the erors of the principal that a "customer is always right" and the financial impacts it has on a business. I have had people yell at me...check that scream at me for the most rediculous stuff. There is a however though....
....however a company needs to view the customer. If it is someone that has a history if complaining and needing new services or products at no cost the company has a right to stand ther ground and say no. If it is a customer who has not just been with the company but continuously upgraded, bought, renewed services without a trail of complaints and issues than that customer needs to be handled differently period end of story. A customer should NEVER have to mention how loyal they have been when a situation is not being handled properly. A manager/rep should already know or at least take the time to review this info when a customer is unhappy.
Corporate America has let a few bad apples ruin their relationship with upstanding loyal customers by locking down their policies and making things difficult for people to get resolutions to their problems.
See I view customer service through a few principles.
1.) It is easier to keep a customer than it is to draw new ones. This is an actual proven marketing/business strategy.
2.) A service situation is a chance to prove how good your service really is
3.) Building long term relationships provides a company with a more structure and financial support than the flash in the pan customer.
I do not know all of Verizon's official policies. I am willing to deal with a two tier technical support that one is practically useless to me with my knowledge of phones and products. However as a consumer I refuse to be treated like a fool and an idiot. Granted I am only hearing one side of the story but I am willing to bet some serious cash that Vance lost his cool because he was presented with a smug attitude and shoulder shrug that basically told him "to bad, so sad, next happy customer please" solution(sic).
Customer service jobs blow, it is a thankless job where in many cases your empowerment often comes at a price. You are the face and voice of a company in every action taken wether that is with a customer or vendor. However that is the challenge that you can see some people embrace and some fail miserably. Unfortunately it is the failures that people remember or make light of.