Think it is really just a matter of perspective in that picture, there won't be a SD slot in that tray
At a very competitive price, not $750 or more. Then it might be a home run.I would like a removable battery and card slot but I think the way for them to hit a home run here is to:
Offer a huge battery for the best battery life in its class and give us large internal storage. I think that would work. They have to have something to set this apart from the S6 Plus. This is the flagship device for them.
I would like a removable battery and card slot but I think the way for them to hit a home run here is to:
Offer a huge battery for the best battery life in its class and give us large internal storage. I think that would work. They have to have something to set this apart from the S6 Plus. This is the flagship device for them.
I can only speak for myself but I've come up with a solution that seemed like a no-brainer to me:
I never buy carrier-branded smartphones and, guess what, THERE IS NO SIM-CARD in my "phone", all I really need is a private, powerful PDA / pocketable tablet for my apps (lots of them) and data.
For phone-calls I still use my old clamshell "hard-keyed" NOKIA-phone which happens to have a genuine electrical power-on/off switch. And just in case that it will give up on me, I already have a new twin-model as a spare.
Problem solved! ;-)
If the display is power efficient (not very likely since Moto farms out for their displays) like the Note 4, I would buy the 64GB version. The 3,000 mah fixed battery though is likely going to be a problem. 5.7" 1440p LCD and a 808 chip that is no more power efficient than the 805 in the Note 4. My guess is at least 2.5 hours less screen time than the Note 4- presuming not too much white screen in the background of course on the Note 4.
Oops! Darn Thanks button.The screen is 1080p, not 1440. No TouchWiz either so I'd think the new moto x would be similar to the note 4 in terms of battery life.
Oops! Darn Thanks button.
That's the Pure edition with an SD 610 procesor or something.
The Style edition has the hi res screen and SD 808.
The only thing I do not like about Motorola is the Camera. The shots from the Moto X, Droid, and Nexus have not been that Great in the past in my opinion.The Moto X does have an SD card, is 5.7, and starts at 400 dollars with a price bump of 50 per storage bump. The storage is 16/32/64.
The only thing I do not like about Motorola is the Camera. The shots from the Moto X, Droid, and Nexus have not been that Great in the past in my opinion.
Sent from my GNOTE4 using Tapatalk
You may want to quote the post you're responding to somewhat aggressively.What are you even talking about. Tell me on which planet will that happen? People still buy and carriers still sell basic flip phones for crying out loud. Get your head out of the techno morass that it's in and understand that people have different needs and there will always be someone willing to supply that need because they can make a buck out of it.
Cool if correct, but usually the tray is wider/thicker if also fitting the sd slot. Looks like no room for both.