Just explain an answer if they say they are hacked why question it??
Because we get this sort of thing all the time here. Another recent example was someone found an app with the name "informant" in it and immediately assumed it was law enforcement hacked into their phone. A simple Google search later, turns out it was an OEM app for a widget, and nothing to do with spying or hacking.
People like to explore things and find stuff that looks incriminating on their phones. Or they notice something as innocent as a glitch and think it's a hacker. Or they start getting spammed with advertising from an app and think it's Android itself doing it. As I said in my first reply, it's hard to hack into an Android phone, so rarely should that be the first assumption when something doesn't seem right.
That's why I, and the other ambassadors, trusted members, and long time members, ask these sorts of follow-up questions. We need more info to go on so that we aren't giving bad advise. It's like having the check engine light on in your car, then taking it for an oil change thinking that is the problem. Us assuming the member is correct in their assumption would be like the mechanic doing the oil change and nothing more. You'd get your car back with the check engine light still on and get mad at the mechanic because it didn't turn the light off, even though you only wanted an oil change and didn't ask him to investigate the actual problem. Good mechanics will try to find the root of the problem, which includes finding out more info about the symptoms. We are no different.