Respectfully, someone saying "that is a fact" and basing their assertion on assumptions without using the device, and attempting to discredit the reports and empirical data provided by people who have actually used the phone that is contrary to their "fact," is not very respectful.
Reading through this forum it sounds like many who haven't actually used this phone are trying to vehemently claim it's a mistake to buy the phone because of their assumptions about battery life and are refusing to accept direct reports and evidentiary screenshots by people who actually have used the phones, insisting that what they assume will be more correct than empirical data.
Now, let's start with "above average" because that isn't a specific figure. If you say it refers to the top 1% of users, I doubt you'll find any phone that suffices, and if you do, what if it refers to the top 0.01%? You can make your assertion accurate or inaccurate by just moving the target. Let's consider some facts. In a recent study, it was determined that the actual average user uses about 3h15m SOT. Only the top 20% of users begin to use move than 4.5h SOT (
Source). The truth is that the Pixel 4 is actually fully sufficient for the average user, and the 4 XL excessively so. The fact that other phones offer battery life in excess does not change that fact. Now for the above average user - let's take that top 20% since we know what they use - the 4 could be problematic, but the 4 XL is still far more than sufficient. And none of this takes into consideration that most people are neither vehemently opposed in righteous indignation to the concept of, nor lacking the access throughout the entire day to electricity, actually plugging in their phone for the very short amount of time it takes to substantially recharge their device.
The FACT is that the 4 is fully sufficient for the average user, and the 4 XL is fully sufficient for 80%, both without a top-off during the day. This also means that for many it will not be fully sufficient, and if they are unable or for some reason unwilling to connect a charger, this might be a phone to take off the shopping list.
Battery life is clearly not something Google put focus on this year. The 4 while sufficient for the average user, should have been able to accommodate a bit more so that more people could base their decision, if deciding between the 4 and 4 XL, on size, rather than how long it will support them.
Most people honestly only care that the battery lasts them throughout the day, and don't consider it a burden to plug it in when in the car, etc. Having excessively more battery life than you need doesn't hurt you, but it doesn't generally help either, and it's shameful that so much focus has been put on this one bullet point which, while not at the level of much of its competition, is still fully sufficient for the vast majority.
If roles were reversed and Google held Samsung's market share, and they held Google's, the focus would be on Samsung's continued failure to offer timely security updates, better AI, enhanced safety features, etc., and a generally more intuitive experience with the phone.