Droid Bionic price page up

.020 is the thickness of a fingernail. I would definitely say that's the same thickness.
 
If the DCharge started at $299.99, The DBionick....

Will most likely start at $349.99...


This is crazy.
 
this has turned into a debby downer phone 1gb memory more 512for. phone 512 for webtop which ill never use better processor nope. tegra is better and has that nvideo name that gets folk to buy. no kick stand looks like all other phones doesn't set its self apart Sprint phone looks different and better 4.3 screen fail all those super phones have it how about 4.5 or bigger. size matters
 
this has turned into a debby downer phone 1gb memory more 512for. phone 512 for webtop which ill never use better processor nope. tegra is better and has that nvideo name that gets folk to buy. no kick stand looks like all other phones doesn't set its self apart Sprint phone looks different and better 4.3 screen fail all those super phones have it how about 4.5 or bigger. size matters

One more time for grins- webtop does not have 512MB dedicated to it, nor any significant amount of the 1GB until it is running.

All those other phones have 4.5" screens or bigger? Hunh? What percentage of all smartphones available now or planned for near-term release have screens of 4.5"+? It's more than just a little bit shy of being all.

I would have preferred Tegra as well, but it's going to be a pretty small difference in performance.

You are correct, however, that the Bionic does not have a kickstand. Clearly it is a relic of another age- practically a feature phone!

Enjoy your Sprint phone with a kickstand and laugh at the rest of us schmucks in the dark ages.
 
Last edited:
this has turned into a debby downer phone 1gb memory more 512for. phone 512 for webtop which ill never use better processor nope. tegra is better and has that nvideo name that gets folk to buy. no kick stand looks like all other phones doesn't set its self apart Sprint phone looks different and better 4.3 screen fail all those super phones have it how about 4.5 or bigger. size matters

Do you need to over compensate for something?
 
One more time for grins- webtop does not have 512MB dedicated to it, nor any significant amount of the 1GB until it is running.

All those other phones have 4.5" screens or bigger? Hunh? What percentage of all smartphones available now or planned for near-term release have screens of 4.5"+? It's more than just a little bit shy of being all.

I would have preferred Tegra as well, but it's going to be a pretty small difference in performance.

You are correct, however, that the Bionic does not have a kickstand. Clearly it is a relic of another age- practically a feature phone!

Enjoy your Sprint phone with a kickstand and laugh at the rest of us schmucks in the dark ages.

Isn't the OMAP 4430 supposed to be alot fast than the tegra 2?
 
So on androidcentral.coms home page you see a picture of the droid bionic with pricing. Where is that from?

Can't find it. or is that fake all together?


edit: nvm says its a leaked page. got my hopes up for nothing


I believe it's been proven to be photoshopped already.
 
this has turned into a debby downer phone 1gb memory more 512for. phone 512 for webtop which ill never use better processor nope. tegra is better and has that nvideo name that gets folk to buy. no kick stand looks like all other phones doesn't set its self apart Sprint phone looks different and better 4.3 screen fail all those super phones have it how about 4.5 or bigger. size matters

I'll post this from an XDA thread one more time and maybe it will sink in:

"About RAM: You can see through comparision between Atrix and Galaxy S2:

- Atrix has 818MB Ram for Apps, with stock apps ( included bloatwares ), free Ram ~ 480 - 560MB. My Atrix free upto 620MB with many apps installed :D

- Galaxy S2 has 848 Ram for Apps, same condition, free Ram ~ 454 - 550MB."



So, comparing Atrix to SGSII we see they have almost an identical amount of their 1Gb of RAM available for apps. Bionic should be similar to Atrix I would think.
 
I'll post this from an XDA thread one more time and maybe it will sink in:

"About RAM: You can see through comparision between Atrix and Galaxy S2:

- Atrix has 818MB Ram for Apps, with stock apps ( included bloatwares ), free Ram ~ 480 - 560MB. My Atrix free upto 620MB with many apps installed :D

- Galaxy S2 has 848 Ram for Apps, same condition, free Ram ~ 454 - 550MB."



So, comparing Atrix to SGSII we see they have almost an identical amount of their 1Gb of RAM available for apps. Bionic should be similar to Atrix I would think.

I agree, people keep spewing that rumor that weptop takes half the RAM when not in use. IT IS NOT TRUE!!
 
I figure like this $200 for droid 3, $50 extra for dual core/ +512 ddr2 ram and $50 extra for LTE. Add it all up and it is $300
 
Isn't the OMAP 4430 supposed to be alot fast than the tegra 2?

Based on released devices using benchmarks such as Quadrant and Linpack for Dual Core processors... Dual Core Samsung Exynos > TI OMAP4 > NVIDIA Tegra2

The only thing that the Tegra 2 does better in is graphics performance since it has an integrated GPU.
 
Based on released devices using benchmarks such as Quadrant and Linpack for Dual Core processors... Dual Core Samsung Exynos > TI OMAP4 > NVIDIA Tegra2

The only thing that the Tegra 2 does better in is graphics performance since it has an integrated GPU.

Problem with all those benchmarks though is that the SGS2 which uses the Exynos processor has a lower resolution and is clocked slightly higher at 1.2ghz vs. 1 ghz of the OMAP4. This is going to cause scores of anything with a qHD screen to be slightly lower.
 
So on androidcentral.coms home page you see a picture of the droid bionic with pricing. Where is that from?

Can't find it. or is that fake all together?


edit: nvm says its a leaked page. got my hopes up for nothing
 

Latest posts

Trending Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
956,461
Messages
6,968,359
Members
3,163,550
Latest member
jimmyrichard