I'm in the same boat Wilson... The storm has been quite the ride, and I'll be glad when it's over.
<please Verizon...overnight that phone!>
\My latest date is the 7th. Good luck!
Ordered mine as an exchange on the 20th, haven't received an email conformation or anything yet. Just a credit card bill, that kind of worries me. I would at least like to be able to check the status of the order at my Verizon.
does anyone else think that this is not an issue with motorola supplying phones to verizon but is really just verizon having phones in warehouses and either not wanting to hire anough people to process them for shipping or just not caring when customers get delivery because they already have the money? what if we did that with our bill? i will pay you by august 31, or i might pay you earlier, or i might pay you later...wouldn't that be fun?
No. Its a two prong attack Motorola ships Verizon the phones. They go to the big distribution hubs. Those Hubs ship to the various Warehouses and those warehouse ship to the stores and to customers. Maybe in a few wharehouses they could use a couple extra guys, but what happens when Verizon goes 3 or 4 months without having a phone selling 400k-500k units? You want these wharehouses to start hiring guys just to lay them off in a couple of months?
Its the same reason stock is low in the first place. Even if they can predict ahead of time, demand. They can only account for so much of it during production. To hit intial demand they either A.) Have to hold the phones longer before release to build up stock to ship. B.) Hire and build lines to keep up with initial demand. C.) Hire people for extra shifts. With A everyone waits longer for the phone to be released. B you end up with enormous amounts of extra stock if demand doesn't stay constant throughout production, making the phone a disappointment and decreasing the chance of a similar type of release. C. You end up with the same issue as Verizon you basically are hiring and training people costing 10's of thousands of dollars per hire just to lay them off in a couple months.
Or you can deal with the fact that you are on the cutting edge of technology for your Carrier and they have 2 week back order on stock. My friend still had to wait 3 weeks for his Pre-order he put in a week before the Jesus phone 4 release. That was a production that due to its status had the closest production capacity to match demand out of any general electronic device.
I personally think they are doing what nintendo did and held back supply to create more demand and buzz about them. I also think we are going to see this more and more in the future. I dont think this is the case everytime but I am starting to think it more often.
If you think that is what Nintendo did then your crazy. Its a hard game to figure out. But the last thing they wanted to do was go into the red when the desire for the console died out. But if they could have ended the shortage a year early to do so they would have. They didn't make money on the console (well very little) the money was in the games, people not able to purchase the console means people who can't buy the games.
Ferrari is one of the few manufacturers that can truly hold back on stock to drive up value. A company making devices they want to sell to the masses in mass can't. Value being driven up is only helpful if they can increase the cost as well and Nintendo never changed the price.
hey now let's leave my crazyness out of this
I have a family member who works in the industry and they DID at one point hold back stock to create more demand for it, I dont want it to sound like it was the whole time because it was not and I should have been clear on that, maybe it was just before the holidays or something and I want to say it was a couple times they held back but I dont remember all the details. I am sure at some point there was more demand then supply and that was the case for a lot of it.
