Some of your reasoning is personal preference and some of it isn't quite accurate. I have the OG EVO and I used the kickstand probably twice in 18 months. Now the kickstand is messed up and pops out on its own and is messed up. I'm not happy with it sticking out, especially considering I never used it in the first place.
The Samsung camera has burst mode as well and also a feature so it will pick the best focused picture. I am not sure about slow motion mode but the camera features are probably pretty close. I'm not sure which one has the best looking prictures but I don't think you can declare the EVO LTE to have the better camera right now.
Some people like Sense some people don't, so again that's a personal preference.
The screen is definitely better on the EVO, no argument there.
IF the Samsung radios continue to suck then that would be the main reason I chose the EVO LTE over the GIII. I am probably going to leave Sprint since their 3G network is killing me and VZW has had 4G in my area for quite some time already. If I stay with Sprint I would probably go with the LTE, unless the radio issues are fixed and then I would probably go with the GIII. Everyone has their own needs and wants though and both of these phones are so good I think it comes down to personal preferences more than anything.
Hence "Evo wins for ME".
1- The reviews I read said the HTC camera features were better. Camera quality is a wash I'm sure.
2- I think the vast majority all agree Sense beats touchwiz and always has.
3- Having a kick stand is better than having no kick stand

My statements were completely pointed as a Sprint customer. I wish I had the money to spend on Verizon but I don't and burn through a lot of data for work via tethering etc. If I had the option of switching (if cost was not an issue) to Verizon's LTE Network with the S3 vs Sprints with the EVO...I'd probably do it. I really really like this EVO but the S3 will be a great phone as well even if I don't like the screen.
Last edited: