I don't think the media is up in arms about it... I don't think I've read one review from the media that the FPS is a deal breaker and to not buy the phone because of it.
But if you're going to review the phone or discuss the phone or give your opinion of the phone... I think anyone that is going to be honest and seriously considering a phone and compares features to other phones, is going to admit... the FPS is in a lousy location.
Ergonomically it doesnt work as well for all users as placing it lower and in the center like virtually every other manufacturer that puts the FPS in the back. Samsung basically admitted it's a f-up because they couldnt get the under glass sensor done and IMO took the easy way out instead of redesigning it with sensor in the middle I guess risking battery placement.
People that say they don't need it and use retina only... I'm not sold on that. I don't care to stick my phone up to my face all the time to unlock and it doesnt beat the speed of opening the FPS where while you are taking it out of pocket, you've already put your finger on the sensor and it's unlocked by the time the screen is in eye view day or night.
"The S8 FPS is in the best location ever and stupid no other manufacturer ever realized it"... no one has ever said.
Next year if the rumor is true that they will also use rear FPS in S9... I hope to the heavens they had and took the time to put it in a better place. Also, to mention on the flip side, if it's true the iPhone 8 wont have FPS at all and go with facial recognition, i'm not sold on that idea either until I see it and try it. Rumor of FPS on power button is better than where the S8 sensor is now IMO.
Best position IMO
Am I the only person not really that concerned where the fingerprint sensor is?
The way the media and some people are up in arms over it, you'd think they are asking us to stick our index finger in our rectum to gain access to our phone.
Jeez.