How is samsung and HTC and LG able to get better battery life tests?

Seremedy

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2014
449
0
0
Come on google, you can do a bit better. How is samsung and HTC and LG able to get better battery life tests on anandtech and phonearena etc. The 6P has one of the biggest batterys and the S7E gets around 10-13 hours of YouTube playback depending if snapdragon or exynos and the yP is scoring around a measily 5. same thing with browsing tests, 6p just doesnt come close. I have the S7E and 6P and my S7E is way better in terms of battery life. It has 150 more mah and touchwiz thats a resource hog to power and the 6P cant come close... i cant get 6-7 hours SOT while my 6P gets about 4 to 5

Posted via the Android Central App
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

Don't take too much stock in those tests. Battery life varies wildly depending on usage, so the info in those tests likely don't apply to most of us. I've been getting decent battery life on my 6P, about 5ish hours SOT over 24 hours.

Posted via my Nexus 6P on VerLIEzon Wireless but without their shackles.
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

SD 810 vs 820 perhaps?

Posted via the Android Central App
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

SD 810 vs 820 perhaps?

Posted via the Android Central App

The HTC 10 is getting 4-5 hours on the 3,000mAh battery which is less than the M8 was brand new with the 801. I am not that impressed with this 820 to be honest. I thought it would be a huge leap forward battery wise.

Posted via the Android Central App
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

If you're having battery issues, I'm sure people here would be willing to help you sort those out. However, making a thread complaining about the device and saying that Google can "do better" is kind of ridiculous - the Nexus 6P was almost universally declared the best phone of 2015, with some places such as Android Central considering it to be the "Best Android phone ever made" - maybe there's an issue with your device that we can help you solve? If you do have a problem, request help. If you prefer another phone, sell your 6P and buy another phone. Making a thread like this and citing the notoriously unreliable "battery usage tests" doesn't help anything.
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

If Samsung and HTC are getting better battery life on that website that could have been an issue except for one thing: the phones are Samsung and HTC.
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

OK, for every action, there's a reaction... Mr Newton's insight in the world is amazing, and it even applies to phones. You can get your 6P to have battery life more on par with the S7E, but in doing so, your 6P is going to feel a lot more like a S7E and less like a 6P. My wife has an S7 and while I can see that the 820 is a faster chip, it gets there in a bit of a sputter-y kind of way. My 6P feels a lot more fluid... nothing drastic, mind you, but there is a distinctly different feel to both phones that you notice once you use both for an extended time.

And that fluidity comes from the kernel configuration. The 6P's kernel is set up to be pretty vanilla, trying to strike a balance between system performance and power usage. Others, such as Samsung, tend to calibrate it towards reducing power usage. Now, the effect of that choice means that in certain situations, the S7's CPU will be humming along at a lower relative speed than the 6P's.... and scaling up that CPU to the speed needed for the task at hand take a little bit more time.... enough to be noticed.

So the option is there to load a custom kernel (which isn't the case for the S7 820 variant, nor may it ever be) and with a few tweaks here or there increase the amount of screen time you get by a rather sizable amount. And some enterprising types are fussing with configurations aimed to get the best of both worlds... highly customized settings that basically increase the responsiveness of the CPU.... so you get reduced power usage without the hit on day to day, light duty performance.

Or... you leave well enough alone. The 6P's mileage is well past my own personal usage point (i.e the amount of time I typically use it in a day) So I don't have any battery anxiety. The way I see it is that if a phone is at that point, worrying about it's ranking in an arbitrary test isn't really worth it.
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

Also consider the Nexus 6p is going on 7 months old. All the other flagships just came out! My 6p only gets 2.5-3 hours of SOT compared to my iPhone that was getting 8+ hours of SOT. Im thinking of getting the Blackberry Priv until the next Nexus comes out. The 6p is a solid phone man.

Posted via the Android Central App
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

Also consider the Nexus 6p is going on 7 months old. All the other flagships just came out! My 6p only gets 2.5-3 hours of SOT compared to my iPhone that was getting 8+ hours of SOT. Im thinking of getting the Blackberry Priv until the next Nexus comes out. The 6p is a solid phone man.

Posted via the Android Central App

You probably mean 8 hours usage not 8 hours SOT. Many confuse the two and IOS combines usage in with SOT.

Posted via the Android Central App
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

You probably mean 8 hours usage not 8 hours SOT. Many confuse the two and IOS combines usage in with SOT.

Yep... If I reported my 6P's battery usage like iOS did, I would be in the 9 to 10 hours range. Why Apple doesn't report screen usage specifically, I have no idea. But it leads to people believing grossly misleading battery performance numbers on iOS devices.
 
Re: Nexus 6p...

OK, for every action, there's a reaction... Mr Newton's insight in the world is amazing, and it even applies to phones. You can get your 6P to have battery life more on par with the S7E, but in doing so, your 6P is going to feel a lot more like a S7E and less like a 6P. My wife has an S7 and while I can see that the 820 is a faster chip, it gets there in a bit of a sputter-y kind of way. My 6P feels a lot more fluid... nothing drastic, mind you, but there is a distinctly different feel to both phones that you notice once you use both for an extended time.

And that fluidity comes from the kernel configuration. The 6P's kernel is set up to be pretty vanilla, trying to strike a balance between system performance and power usage. Others, such as Samsung, tend to calibrate it towards reducing power usage. Now, the effect of that choice means that in certain situations, the S7's CPU will be humming along at a lower relative speed than the 6P's.... and scaling up that CPU to the speed needed for the task at hand take a little bit more time.... enough to be noticed.


So the option is there to load a custom kernel (which isn't the case for the S7 820 variant, nor may it ever be) and with a few tweaks here or there increase the amount of screen time you get by a rather sizable amount. And some enterprising types are fussing with configurations aimed to get the best of both worlds... highly customized settings that basically increase the responsiveness of the CPU.... so you get reduced power usage without the hit on day to day, light duty performance.

Or... you leave well enough alone. The 6P's mileage is well past my own personal usage point (i.e the amount of time I typically use it in a day) So I don't have any battery anxiety. The way I see it is that if a phone is at that point, worrying about it's ranking in an arbitrary test isn't really worth it.
Although a bit on the technical side,I can certainly see where you`re coming from.I`m now using my 6P 24/7 and am extremely happy with it.I`ve come from a Samsung S6 and because I`m not using it at the moment I`ve given it a factory reset and added a few apps so that if needs be I can put my sim in and use it straight away.Even though it`s now a "clean phone" it has nowhere near the performance of my 6P.What I considered to be quite a fast and non-laggy phone is now just that,slow and a bit stuttery.The only thing I can put it down to is the Samsung bloatware and the way the phone has been "configured" by Samsung to perform in the way Leo has described....plus the fact that the Marshmallow update from EE(Tmobile) in the UK still hasn`t arrived.One other thing of note,I charged my 6P fully and left it overnight to see how much battery was used and found that from about 11pm to 6.30am it only used 3%....the S6 on the same test,set up almost exactly the same way used 11%...go figure!
 
Last edited:

Trending Posts

Forum statistics

Threads
957,611
Messages
6,973,736
Members
3,163,862
Latest member
sulagmu1