I've done 4 Samsung warranty exchanges between the 7 Samsungs I've owned (and another i could've) and 1 exchange on 5 LG's. You can get a lemon with any manufacturer, Samsung and apple included.
32 GB is really pathetic however some people don't use it all up. The DAC was really intended for the V series. The 835 wasn't available because Samsung hoarded them.
HTC and Sony had them with in a month of the release. All LG had to do was wait a month. Instead they decided to move forward with last years chip so they could be Samsung to market by a few weeks. In the end it would up costing LG. People can keep saying the chip and storage don't matter, but the G6 sales show otherwise.
In addition, most of their customers for the G6 couldn't give two if the phone had an 821 or an 835 or an 80gazillion. They just buy phones because they look nice and the sales rep said "buy this." We people who care about what hardware a phone has are in the minority. Unless a ton more people start caring about the actual specs of the phone (and start coming onto Android/phone boards), the companies will still produce products such as the G6 that don't "have our approval."
This. Enthusiasts can be helpful for a device through family and friends' recommendations but we are in a huge echo chamber here on sites like this.
I honestly believe that creating a commercially successful phone is simple (simple is NOT to be confused with easy).
99 percent of consumers would never pay attention to a phones bands.And now that Tmobile has announced that the S8 won't be compatible with their new 600mhz frequency (compared to Verizon's 700) and LGv30 is...well, yup...LG will be supreme.
Scanning through the various hands-on reviews here on this site and a few others and the ergonomics and 'feel in hand' comments are very positive; feels like a high-end Samsung, but lighter and better fingerprint scanner location. Seems to compare favourably to the S8 series. Looks like they clearly borrowed from Samsung to me, and that's not a criticism (except for the slightly curved glass on the front that will make tempered glass a pain, but customers in stores will still pick them up and like the feel).
I think this phone will siphon off a lot of S8/S8+ sales, and even the odd Note 8 sale as long as the rollout goes smoothly.
Battery life vs the S8+ might be tough though. With the thin and light chassis on the V30, I think they could have stuffed another 200mah or so in there and not manage to start fires
Time to wait for reviews to determine if this will really be a hit. Want to see low-light camera samples next.
99 percent of consumers would never pay attention to a phones bands.
200mah is insignificant especially if you factor in fast charging and wireless charging. I would have like to have seen a thicker form factor with 3800mah
Yep I agree with you. LG made the V30 very similar to the mainstream and top dog Samsung phones to narrow the gap and yet retain the other unique and surperior features the V series has over other phones. Sadly Huawei(and Blackberry's KeyONE) is the only OEM that cares about placing 4000mAh batteries in their flagships. No one else that I can think of is doing it. They tend to save the big batteries for budget devices.Scanning through the various hands-on reviews here on this site and a few others and the ergonomics and 'feel in hand' comments are very positive; feels like a high-end Samsung, but lighter and better fingerprint scanner location. Seems to compare favourably to the S8 series. Looks like they clearly borrowed from Samsung to me, and that's not a criticism (except for the slightly curved glass on the front that will make tempered glass a pain, but customers in stores will still pick them up and like the feel).
I think this phone will siphon off a lot of S8/S8+ sales, and even the odd Note 8 sale as long as the rollout goes smoothly.
Battery life vs the S8+ might be tough though. With the thin and light chassis on the V30, I think they could have stuffed another 200mah or so in there and not manage to start fires
Time to wait for reviews to determine if this will really be a hit. Want to see low-light camera samples next.
And that's why Verizon has held the lead, because of their logo?99 percent of consumers would never pay attention to a phones bands.
The sales aren't good because simply they don't have the name SAMSUNG. It doesn't matter how good a phone the G6 is. LG was smart to use last year's processor as it probably saved them money.HTC and Sony had them with in a month of the release. All LG had to do was wait a month. Instead they decided to move forward with last years chip so they could be Samsung to market by a few weeks. In the end it would up costing LG. People can keep saying the chip and storage don't matter, but the G6 sales show otherwise.
The sales aren't good because simply they don't have the name SAMSUNG. It doesn't matter how good a phone the G6 is. LG was smart to use last year's processor as it probably saved them money.
It has nothing to do with the name. It has to do with their products.