Given the specs are similar to the Moto 360 1st Gen., I am questioning if the price point is acceptable. It seems strange that a watch from 2 years ago can potentially go toe to toe with one made 2 years later.
Sure, the CPU in theory should outperform it. But, to be fair, how many readers have learned that the spec sheet can sometimes lie? The Moto X 2013 didn't have a stellar spec sheet, but was, in fact, a sleeper phone.
Your thoughts?
Sure, the CPU in theory should outperform it. But, to be fair, how many readers have learned that the spec sheet can sometimes lie? The Moto X 2013 didn't have a stellar spec sheet, but was, in fact, a sleeper phone.
Your thoughts?