Re: Nexus 9.... I went with a Shield tablet instead
some of your comparisons are a little off (to the advantage of the Nexus 9 though):
1.) The CPU frequencies can't really be directly compared and drawn any conclusions, because of how vastly different the micro architectures are. The Denver cores are deceptively faster than it would seem to an otherwise uneducated bystander.
2.) The N9 having a 4:3 screen means that it has an even bigger usable screen than an 8.9" 16:10 tablet would.
3.) Don't forget that SD cards are still using the insecure FAT file system for their partitions, which is just no bueno if you care a little about privacy.
4.) Subjectively speaking, the Nexus 9 appears to have a much better build quality/feel than the Shield Tablet does.
5.) Access to a much faster update schedule.
6.) Possibly better power consumption, because the denver cores aren't based on the A15 ARM design.
I disagree with a lot of the things you've said in this thread, but you're quite correct this time on individual facts and that the Nvidia Shield Tablet is, by no means, a superior device (or even comparable device).
First the price of the Shield is $299 and the Nexus 9 is $399 for the same 16GB of internal memory. Not even close to double the price. If a $100 is that much then you should consider the Nexus 7 that is a $100 less than the Shield as a bigger bargain.
However for $100 more than the Shield the Nexus 9 has many more improved features over the Shield.
The N9 has HTC's Boom Sound that alone is worth a lot of the price differences.
The N9 has faster CPU clock speed that is 4.55% faster CPU clock speed plus 7 Superscalers execution paths vs 3 in the Shield.
The N9 has Clearly higher resolution of 28% higher resolution of 2048x1440 px vs the Shield's 1920x1200 px
The N9 has 11.25% bigger screen size of 8.9 " vs Shield's 8 "
The N9 is Thinner 7.9 mm vs Shield's 9.2 mm
The N9 camera has a flash LED and has more megapixels of 8 MP vs The Shield's 5 MP
The N9 has optional 32 GB internal storage vs the Shield's 16 GB which does have SD expansion port even if Apps can't be stored on the SD card without hacking it.
The N9 is Is DLNA certified which allow devices connected to the same network to transferred easily between them. The Shield isn't DLNA certified.
The N9 has a fast 802.11ac WiFi connection where the Shield has the older Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band.
The N9 has three full subpixels per pixel, resulting in a sharp and crisp picture. Pixels in some displays (like AMOLED) share one subpixel to preserve space. This can result in a less crisp, slightly blurred image.
The N9 has Nvidia Tegra K1 (64-bit) CPU and the Shield has Nvidia Tegra K1 (32-bit). The N9 is more Future Proof by a much wider margin.
The N9 Supports ECC memory the Shield doesn't. Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
HTC Nexus 9 vs Nvidia Shield Tablet - Tablets Specs Comparison
some of your comparisons are a little off (to the advantage of the Nexus 9 though):
1.) The CPU frequencies can't really be directly compared and drawn any conclusions, because of how vastly different the micro architectures are. The Denver cores are deceptively faster than it would seem to an otherwise uneducated bystander.
2.) The N9 having a 4:3 screen means that it has an even bigger usable screen than an 8.9" 16:10 tablet would.
3.) Don't forget that SD cards are still using the insecure FAT file system for their partitions, which is just no bueno if you care a little about privacy.
4.) Subjectively speaking, the Nexus 9 appears to have a much better build quality/feel than the Shield Tablet does.
5.) Access to a much faster update schedule.
6.) Possibly better power consumption, because the denver cores aren't based on the A15 ARM design.
I disagree with a lot of the things you've said in this thread, but you're quite correct this time on individual facts and that the Nvidia Shield Tablet is, by no means, a superior device (or even comparable device).