....
Especially for a concert, that's a really solid pic. Cameras in phones have been notoriously terrible at that. I can't say that is a terrible picture at all. I'm still not seeing how this camera sucks...Here is one more from the Bastille concert last night. Did pretty well in low light
Panoramic afternoon sky shot.
Serious question: How come there is such a gulf between photos posted here and sample photos posted on website reviews/blogs, etc? I mean, they are almost all unanimous about the Moto X's average camera versus everyone here almost unanimously showing great quality photos.
What's the disparity? How can we have such polarizing results all from one camp and the other all from another? I'm not saying anyone is being dishonest or manipulating photos here in this thread. I am asking a serious question; what is causing the difference?
Because people tend not to share crappy photos while blogs (probably) look for 'typical' shots and not just the 'best' shots.
Here's one of our dogs in her chair. Clearly full sun outside - not dark inside at all. Doesn't look great. About on par with the nexus 5 I was doing side-by-sides with.
Indoors is like no light. Just a tradeoff when you go motoUgh still - low light is like no light![]()
same pic nexus 5
Looks better. The nexus 5 camera has really grown to be pretty good in my opinion. People are always really impressed with my nexus pics.
Sigh. Such a shame about the moto x camera. At this point it's keeping me from pulling the trigge . I need to wait to see a software update and see how the resulsts are before I can commit.
Thanks for sharing.
Its like this with every Motorola phone. It won't improve with updates so if its not good enough now then you should maybe go to your plan b if you have one.
Posted via the Android Central App