Johnly
Retired Moderator
Just wanted to jump in and add that we DO have a control here - the towers are a common fixed element.
Mine stays locked in 3G for the battery life and I'll only put it into 4G if I want a little extra speed and a lot of frustration. Most of my audio-visual purchases in the past few years have been exclusively Samsung products; needless to say, I am quite disappointed in the GNex as a consumer-product and would be embarrassed beyond belief if I was them, Google, or Verizon at this point. Too bad there's no lemon-law for cellphones.
Yes. The control can be the tower; however, a control doesn't need to be a fixed element. The control just needs to be measured unbiased. So we need a few more towers at the very least. To get an idea. Ideally we don't have a perfect control, but we need more data. A low dbm isn't a serious flaw, and isn't something to freak over.
Many phones have a low dbm, they are the low quality generic ones. This is where people go wrong, they think the Galaxy is a top shelf device with the best hardware. It is not, it is more like a fascinate or a mid range smart phone. It won't perform like the MAXX or the iPhone....LTE withheld. It isn't a serious flaw, it is a phone with an intended generic radio to save on production. Pick one up, it is a plastic mass produced Sammy. If you are looking for a phone with a good radio, get a Moto, simple.
There you have it, knowing that the galaxy performs like a fascinate, you can buy premium phones or mid range ones, I think the dbm of the nexus is tetering on the entry level phones. I say it all over the place, google needs a better product if they want to compete with the best. I think we could solidify this experiment by recreating it a million times but the same thing is revealed, the galaxy never promised to be the king of reception, and it isn't.