I get a screen protector every time I get a new phone. I removed the one on my s20+ after about 6 mos and didn't put another one on until I got the s23+. I loved it without as the naked screen never had finger smudges (wish I could say the same about dog nose smudges...). I do not have a single scratch on the s20+ and I am known for dropping my phone frequently and leaving it my scrubs pocket 9-10hrs a day or in my jeans pocket. A naked screen is by far the best way to go. I see me removing my current protector as soon as I feel the newness wear off. LOL
Agreed. I had no screen protector on my Note 9. Then I tried the White Stone Dome on my Note 20 Ultra - my wife took hers off in just a few days. I think I lasted about a week. I hated the sharp edges and the decreased accuracy of the FPS.
So I ran naked on that screen, naked on the S22 Ultra, and now naked on the S23 Ultra.
I figure that the insurance deductible cost to replace a screen is less than we have saved over the years of not buying the WSD. Plus, the experience is better.
And I don't know if I believe that the screen protector saves you from a shattered screen. I know people say "I dropped my phone, and the protector shattered, but not my screen. Therefore, it saved me"
But I don't think that proves that the screen would have broken without the screen protector. I've seen plenty of hard drops on hard surfaces that have not shattered screens. And, I remember seeing a lot of posts in the last few years about the WSDs breaking during delivery. So I think we know they are fragile.
So, to each his own, but I've had great luck and a more enjoyable experience without a screen protector. Of course, I don't want to pay for a screen, but in reality, I can afford it if it ever happens.
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk